Hello,
Thanks for reviving this - and sorry for the delay. It looks like your
previous E-Mail got lost somehow.
I can reproduce this issue and have registered it as:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/4065
It looks like the array-contained-in-setof-function-results use-case won't
really work
I asked you once when the 3.6 release was planned, and you more or less
told me that it will take many months.
I'm not just trying JOOQ but plan to use it in production, if it helps me,
quite soon. That being considered, I can't plan to release a Java artifact
built upon a SNAPSHOT release
2015-02-16 14:25 GMT+01:00 adrien.barr...@live.fr:
I asked you once when the 3.6 release was planned, and you more or less
told me that it will take many months.
I'm not just trying JOOQ but plan to use it in production, if it helps me,
quite soon. That being considered, I can't plan to
Hi there.
I see that your own answer has crossed mine here:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/28543891/521799
For the record, I'm still going to post my Stack Overflow answer again here
on the jOOQ user group:
Whenever you hit jOOQ's limits, resort to plain SQL
Thanks Lucas, that's a nicer answer. For future reference, do you prefer
questions to this list or on StackOverflow?
Cheers,
Eelco
On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 9:44:01 AM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote:
Hi there.
I see that your own answer has crossed mine here:
You can post wherever you prefer. If you post to both places, it's always a
good idea to cross-link between them (as you did).
2015-02-16 15:49 GMT+01:00 Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.com:
Thanks Lucas, that's a nicer answer. For future reference, do you prefer
questions to this list
Update: tested with JOOQ 3.5.2, but same result.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups jOOQ
User Group group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options,
