Hi Max,
Thanks for your message. Indeed, it would be handy - I don't deny that at
all. The problem with jOOQ's current API is that we cannot implement this
without breaking the API. Or, we could use a dummy name instead of unnest -
so we don't have to touch the existing API. The existing API reads
Hi all,
We are using jOOQ 3.6.4 because that is the most recent version that
does not require JDK 1.8.
I ran into a strange problem yesterday when a jOOQ query did not work.
I boiled it down to the following:
dslContext
.select(DSL.val(Integer.valueOf(1)))
.getQue
Yes I hear you, probably not worth it then.
You are right we are only using unset on a single column. The use case is
the common "tags" field where you have an array of tags on a record.
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 7:38:54 AM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> Thanks for your message
On 16 February 2017 at 09:15, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> We are using jOOQ 3.6.4 because that is the most recent version that
> does not require JDK 1.8.
>
> I ran into a strange problem yesterday when a jOOQ query did not work.
> I boiled it down to the following:
>
> dslContext
> .s