Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Ticket #263, cancelling an upload

2008-08-10 Thread Florian Heer
Dirk Stöcker schrieb: On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Florian Heer wrote: I hope ticket #263 can be closed with that (would have inserted in the svn, but apparently i have no access :-) ). Please supply a patch file. Sure, which format? And can svn create that directly? Sorry, all I have

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Ticket #263, cancelling an upload

2008-08-10 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Florian Heer wrote: I hope ticket #263 can be closed with that (would have inserted in the svn, but apparently i have no access :-) ). Please supply a patch file. Sure, which format? And can svn create that directly? Sorry, all I have done with svn is to use it as a

[josm-dev] Difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG

2008-08-10 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
Hi everybody, Help me to understand - what is the difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG? I tried to find a mention in the internet about josm-ng, but unsuccessfully. P.S. sorry for my English. -- Best regards, Evgeny Mandrikov aka Godin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage http://godin.net.ru

Re: [josm-dev] Difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG

2008-08-10 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Help me to understand - what is the difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG? I tried to find a mention in the internet about josm-ng, but unsuccessfully. JOSM-NG has a much cleaner design and is much faster, but it doesn't yet have as much functionality as JOSM has, so people still use JOSM

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Ticket #263, cancelling an upload

2008-08-10 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Florian Heer wrote: Index: org/openstreetmap/josm/io/OsmConnection.java === --- org/openstreetmap/josm/io/OsmConnection.java(revision 761) +++ org/openstreetmap/josm/io/OsmConnection.java

Re: [josm-dev] Difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG

2008-08-10 Thread Gervase Markham
Dirk Stöcker wrote: To me rewrites look like dead-born projects most of the time. Why not fix josm instead? I never understood, why total rewrites from scratch should be useful. Every software can be moved to a new and better design step by step. As I understand it, the reason is a

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Ticket #263, cancelling an upload

2008-08-10 Thread Florian Heer
Dirk Stöcker schrieb: 1 and a half minute is much to much for an cancel. Acceptable is anything That is not 100 seconds, it's 100 milliseconds. I added the higher timeout only to allow a _little_ more time to read a response instead of disconnecting at once. The main problem was that the

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Ticket #263, cancelling an upload

2008-08-10 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Florian Heer wrote: Dirk Stöcker schrieb: 1 and a half minute is much to much for an cancel. Acceptable is anything That is not 100 seconds, it's 100 milliseconds. I added the higher timeout only to allow a _little_ more time to read a response instead of disconnecting

Re: [josm-dev] Difference between JOSM and JOSM-NG

2008-08-10 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: To me rewrites look like dead-born projects most of the time. Why not fix josm instead? I never understood, why total rewrites from scratch should be useful. Every software can be moved to a new and better design step by step. JOSM does carry a lot of baggage.

[josm-dev] Focusing and keyboard shortcut issues under Xnest

2008-08-10 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
I run josm under Xnest because I'm using stumpwm and exporting AWT_TOOLKIT as suggested on the wiki doesn't work[1]: Xnest :1 -ac -geometry 1400x1050 DISPLAY=:1 java -Xmx512M -jar ~/src/josm-latest.jar I have difficulty using the keyboard shortcuts under this setup, sometimes the z, a