Hello,
in #390 there has been some activity to provide a webstart version of JOSM.
Is there some work going in that direction ?
I might help on this, or if no work in progress exists take over this task.
André
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi,
I stumbled over a possible bug in the greatCircleDistance calculation of
the LatLon class. If you zoom out in JOSM so that the MapScale gets
beyond aprox 430 kilometers, the shown value will get _lower_.
I think, that it is a bug in the greatCircleDistance calculation, cause
if you zoom
Hi Detlef,
Detlef Reichl schrieb:
I stumbled over a possible bug in the greatCircleDistance calculation of
the LatLon class. If you zoom out in JOSM so that the MapScale gets
beyond aprox 430 kilometers, the shown value will get _lower_.
I think, that it is a bug in the greatCircleDistance
Am Montag, den 19.01.2009, 16:47 +0100 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
Detlef Reichl schrieb:
I stumbled over a possible bug in the greatCircleDistance calculation of
the LatLon class. If you zoom out in JOSM so that the MapScale gets
beyond aprox 430 kilometers, the shown value will get _lower_.
Hi Detlef,
Detlef Reichl schrieb:
src/org/openstreetmap/josm/gui/MapScaler.java line 30
src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/visitor/MapPaintVisitor.java line
1197
even if I don't like the spherical law of cosines formula, it's
done correctly:
Am Montag, den 19.01.2009, 17:15 +0100 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
Hi Tobias,
The bug must be in the other parts.
I'm a little step further. Form the MapScaller class i printed out the
ll1, ll2 and dist value to the console. It looks like this:
ll1 64.5635383519239 : -19.701032734051942
ll2
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Detlef Reichl detlef.rei...@gmx.orgwrote:
Am Montag, den 19.01.2009, 17:15 +0100 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
Hi Tobias,
The bug must be in the other parts.
I'm a little step further. Form the MapScaller class i printed out the
ll1, ll2 and dist value to the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Detlef Reichl detlef.rei...@gmx.orgwrote:
Am Montag, den 19.01.2009, 17:15 +0100 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
Hi Tobias,
The bug must be in the other parts.
I'm a little step further.
Hi List,
there is again an error in the sources which only occurs in Java 5 but is fine
in Java 6. Since the compile server runs on Java 5 it does not build a new
JAR for downloading.
Here is the error message:
$ ant dist
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[mkdir] Created dir:
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
Hi List,
there is again an error in the sources which only occurs in Java 5 but is
fine
in Java 6. Since the compile server runs on Java 5 it does not build a new
JAR for downloading.
Here is the error message:
$ ant dist
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
My mistake!
I'm a bit unsure how to fix this. Simply remove the @Override statements?
I would say yes, since the annotation is to tell the compile to through errors
when there a method is misspelled. Java 5 allows this only for super classes
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
My mistake!
I'm a bit unsure how to fix this. Simply remove the @Override statements?
I would say yes, since the annotation is to tell the compile to through
errors
when there a method is misspelled. Java 5 allows
On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
Hi List,
there is again an error in the sources which only occurs in Java 5 but is
fine in Java 6. Since the compile server runs on Java 5 it does not build
a new JAR for downloading.
Here is the error message:
On Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
As this problem don't seem to happen very often, please let us know if
that happens again, as I just can't check it here ...
Ok, will do this in the future.
Regards
Andre
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Andre Hinrichs schrieb:
Sorry, my error report was for version 1297 because I went back in the
versions to find what was wrong but in 1298 there was another one introduced.
So two errors are fixed now and one is left:
fixed in 1306
Regards, ULFL
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Ulf Lamping wrote:
P.S: Hmmm, I don't get those problems with my (latest) JDK version. I
thought that the ant scripts were telling the JAVA compiler to be 1.5
like - so I should see this?!?
No. This seems to affect the Java code only. Not the parsing, which is a
bit
16 matches
Mail list logo
