It has been closed. The problem has been considered to belong to Java and
not to JOSM (no fix).
I'll keep continue to update the Java VM... :-(
F.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: josm-dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:josm-dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org]per conto di Fabrizio Carrai
Frederik Ramm wrote:
But while we're at it, give us some reasons why we need to remain
1.5 compatible. I'm not in a hurry to switch to 1.6 but we'll do it
at *some* point and I am interested in finding out what that point
is going to be.
1.6 isn't available for PowerPC Macs, FWIW. Apple
Ľubomír Varga schrieb:
I like system not reinventing wheel. If josm will more rely on third party
code, it will gain better maintability, stability and less code. Only
drawback is in relying on third party code.
Well, there are drawbacks like bugs in third party code that you can't
easily
compatible. I'm not in a hurry to switch to 1.6 but we'll do it at
*some* point and I am interested in finding out what that point is
going
to be.
Mac OS Tiger, Leopard 32bit have no 1.6
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
It will run everywhere. Only problem with portability is that, that on java
1.5 systems is some aditional lib (packable into josm.jar) needed. afaik. But
I see it like handicap, because if Iam not wrong, that lib has about 7 MB.
That is realy big think to bundle with josm. I hope Iam wrong...
1.6 isn't available for PowerPC Macs, FWIW. Apple haven't made a PPC Mac
since 2006. I still use PPC for both my main machines (but then I'm not a
JOSM user so that may be moot).
This is in my view a sufficient reason to insist that everything work
with 1.5.
But, if someone just has to
Ľubomír Varga schrieb:
It will run everywhere. Only problem with portability is that, that on java
1.5 systems is some aditional lib (packable into josm.jar) needed. afaik. But
I see it like handicap, because if Iam not wrong, that lib has about 7 MB.
It's only 1 MB and can be packaged into
Hi,
Henrik Niehaus wrote:
The use case of supporting the GPX standard is equal to the use case
of supporting GPX, in my opinion. Do it right or leave it be.
I was asking because it seemed to me that supporting a tiny subset of
the GPX standard is, in my eyes, sufficient for JOSM - load a
Frederik Ramm writes:
I don't, however, see a pressing need to support any and all extended
GPX features.
Actually, JOSM makes a fine GPX editor. Great for removing those
birds nests when you stopped for lunch.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Cloudmade supports
Fabrizio Carrai schrieb:
It has been closed. The problem has been considered to belong to
Java and
not to JOSM (no fix).
I'll keep continue to update the Java VM... :-(
I have the same problem and I think Java 1.6.0_09 or so introduced this
issue. I have other Java apps running (e.g.
10 matches
Mail list logo