On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Karl Guggisberg wrote:
For some reasons I don't understand stoecker got upset because the page
exists and threatens to delete it. I want to keep it. It's no big deal,
I'm not upset. But there have been numerous cases like this in the past
and people always refer to these
Hi,
you're free to create trac tickets as you wish and you already did. This
page is by no means a replacement of trac ticketing system and I ask
you again not to delete it.
If these are personal notes, then why use an common wiki page instead of a
personal file on your harddisk?
Because
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:49:10AM +0100, Karl Guggisberg wrote:
Hi,
you're free to create trac tickets as you wish and you already did. This
page is by no means a replacement of trac ticketing system and I ask
you again not to delete it.
If these are personal notes, then why
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
you're free to create trac tickets as you wish and you already did. This
This was meant as a how to do. I don't intend to continue this.
page is by no means a replacement of trac ticketing system and I ask
you again not to delete it.
You know the
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/2899/ introduced a new Download
from URL...-entry in the File-menu. What's the difference to the
existing downloadUrl entry there?
Claudius
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
I will not delete the page now (which I never considered), but it will
not stay there longer than approx. 2 months.
I'll continue to work actively with this page and I let you know when it
is not needed anymore or I'll delete it myself, if I feel necessary
(remember, for whatever
Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com writes:
If you plan on writing a book sometime, you better check the first
paragraph with google. :)
I have no ambitions like that.
Btw. the new 'duplicate layer' function seems useful, but maybe it
suffices to put it in the right click menu of the
