On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote:
Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings
the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining 50%.
The other editors don't really count at all ATM.
Don't forget Merkaartor! It has a fair amount of use
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote:
And it is something that should be consistent across different editors.
Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings
the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining
50%. The other editors
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Anthony wrote:
And it is something that should be consistent across different editors.
Actually this is nothing we need to worry about. JOSM is still settings
the standards here. We have 50% of the market. Potlatch the remaining 50%.
The other editors don't really count a
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> It is also unrealistic to expect good OSM data edits every time. Still it's
> good if people try, and good if the software helps them with it.
Agreed.
>> IMO the job of the software should be to make sure the person knows
>> the software ha
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
So do I... I just think it's unrealistic to expect it every time.
It is also unrealistic to expect good OSM data edits every time. Still
it's good if people try, and good if the software helps them with it.
IMO the job of the software should be to make sure the person k
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Arguably, the changeset comment could be split up in a number of individual
> tags. Currently, people use it for different things - they say something
> about the source, about their method, about where they worked, about why
> they changed so
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:08:56PM -0400, Anthony wrote:
>>>
>>> The quality of my own changeset comments is absolutely irrelevant in this
>>> discussion; let's assume, if it gives you pleasure, that they are all just
>>> "...". That might disc
Anthony,
The way I like to think of this is: If you speak to another mapper later that day,
and they ask you "what
you've been up to?" and you answer them in one sentence - that's what you
should put as a changeset
comment.
Sounds like a better place for that would be a diary entry.
If the
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Hello,
according to a Trac ticket JOSM now finally used Java 6 functions. Could
the one who did these changes please document the specific revision in
the Startup page.
The autosave feature [3378] by Jiri introduced Java 6 functions.
So
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/down
