On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:24:35 +0100 (CET), Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011, David Paleino wrote:
>
> > it would be nice if JOSM used .mo files (installed
> > as /usr/share/locale//LC_MESSAGES/josm.mo), instead of
> > jar-embedded .lang files. Please read further.
>
> We dropped gettext
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011, David Paleino wrote:
it would be nice if JOSM used .mo files (installed
as /usr/share/locale//LC_MESSAGES/josm.mo), instead of jar-embedded .lang
files. Please read further.
We dropped gettext files as they are wasting a lot of space in the
translation. The lang files onl
Hello people,
it would be nice if JOSM used .mo files (installed
as /usr/share/locale//LC_MESSAGES/josm.mo), instead of jar-embedded .lang
files. Please read further.
I can only see advantages with that method (and one "disadvantage", which
really seems to be a missing feature of Java). The pros a
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:30:27 +0100, colliar wrote:
> Am 25.12.2011 09:42, schrieb David Paleino:
> > On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 05:59:17 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/25/2011 02:01 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:19:25 +0100, Paul Hartmann wrote:
> >> [..]
> >>
> >> Th
