Hi,
there was a little edit war recently where one mapper put maxheight
on a river node under a bridge, and another mapper removed that again on
the grounds that JOSM used a road traffic sign icon to display it (which
made no sense on water).
Is it possible to say use this icon for
On 04/18/2012 03:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
there was a little edit war recently where one mapper put maxheight
on a river node under a bridge, and another mapper removed that again on
the grounds that JOSM used a road traffic sign icon to display it (which
made no sense on water).
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On a general note, are the (AFAICS German) road signs that JOSM uses in
its default style a good idea for an editor that is used (hopefully)
the world over?
I would say that they are useful in every country that follows the
Am 18. April 2012 17:36 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
As far as I understood, at least something like maxheight is not
necessarily a depiction of any real sign. If there's a bridge that's 3m high
then one would place a maxheight tag even if there is no sign on the ground.
wasn't
I wonder if this is a bug or intentional:
when you split a way part of a turn_restriction josm only associates
the relationship membership for the part of the way that touches the
via point. There is not the usual window asking you to confirm. If you
connect the two parts again you get this window
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if this is a bug or intentional:
when you split a way part of a turn_restriction josm only associates
the relationship membership for the part of the way that touches the
via point. There is not the
Am 18. April 2012 21:44 schrieb Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
I believe this is intentional; the old behavior was problematic in
that requesting confirmation instead of just defaulting to what is the
correct action 99% of the time was breaking turn relations
accidentally.
if you combine
