On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 1/28/11 12:03 PM, Anthony wrote:
Although, frankly, I've always thought the OSMF ban was more of a
don't-ask-don't-tell one. And I guess now that my contributions are
going to be deleted anyway I can come clean
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I understand that there will be a tiny fraction of users negatively affected
by this, but I think it is necessary. We've witnessed a growing number of
Google violations in the past year and I would not want JOSM's
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
At the very least allow people to use whatever imagery that they want
when they're using non-openstreetmap servers.
Better yet, just send the user-agent JOSM with every request. Let
Google decide whether or not to block access
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
If I take notes of which parts I find least intuitive (the parts I
have to RTFM about, like how to reopen those right-side toolbarish
windows), would anyone be interested in them?
Ah ha! That's what the buttons on the left side
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Marko Mäkelä marko.mak...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:08:56PM -0400, Anthony wrote:
The quality of my own changeset comments is absolutely irrelevant in this
discussion; let's assume, if it gives you pleasure, that they are all just
That might
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Arguably, the changeset comment could be split up in a number of individual
tags. Currently, people use it for different things - they say something
about the source, about their method, about where they worked, about why
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It is also unrealistic to expect good OSM data edits every time. Still it's
good if people try, and good if the software helps them with it.
Agreed.
IMO the job of the software should be to make sure the person knows
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 03.08.2010 18:12, schrieb Anthony:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I don't think that the change to 10 chars is a good idea. E.g. if I only
add
a tag to a node
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
I asked you for your username, because I wanted to see what you
consider to be a good changeset comment. It never struck me that you
might not actually consider your own changeset comments
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Klaus Dietrich kl...@gmx.de wrote:
am 26.03.2010 01:41, schrieb Anthony:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:50:23 -0400, Anthony wrote:
In OSM, the way which is tagged
highway represents
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:09:43 -0400, Anthony wrote:
When I lived in New Jersey it was the same way, and I'd imagine it's the
same way in most of the United States.
I'd say more research is needed before we call
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
If you go the absurdist route, maybe. If you want to map the
landuse of the right-of-way, how about landuse=highway?
This has already been
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/12/18 Anthony o...@inbox.org
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net
wrote:
My point was that Wyoming *is* a rectangle in a Mercator projection.
Well, it would have
Spherical geometry allows you to calculate _directly_ on the sphere
without using a projection ... you simple use LatLon in radian
degrees.
True, but it's not really trivial.
A rectangle with 89.55°, 90.1°, 89.89°, 90,01° is no rectangle.
What's the definition of rectangle in
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Spherical geometry allows you to calculate _directly_ on the sphere
without using a projection ... you simple use LatLon in radian
degrees.
True, but it's not really trivial.
A rectangle with 89.55°, 90.1°, 89.89
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.netwrote:
My point was that Wyoming *is* a rectangle in a Mercator projection.
Well, it would have been if they had surveyed it correctly:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.996lon=-110.625zoom=11layers=B000FTF
16 matches
Mail list logo
