Re: [josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-05 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, colliar wrote: >> I don't understand your problem here. The cc is a freetext field. You can >> enter anything there. You get a mail when it is possible to make an email >> from the text. So trac tries to check if the text is a username or an >> email and then sends the status m

Re: [josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-05 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dirk Stöcker schrieb: > I don't understand your problem here. The cc is a freetext field. You can > enter anything there. You get a mail when it is possible to make an email > from the text. So trac tries to check if the text is a username or an

Re: [josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-05 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, colliar wrote: >>> It is also not really obvious that you can use your user-name instead of >>> email-address and if you are logged it does not offer the username but your >>> email-address. >>> >>> Myself did that mistake, and using that part shown with google easily >>> pres

Re: [josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-05 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dirk Stöcker schrieb: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, colliar wrote: > >> I think the addresses shown in trac ( cc:) are to long and not much of >> interest >> for other user. Could you please shorten them somehow that you do almost get >> the >> whole ad

Re: [josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-04 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, colliar wrote: > I think the addresses shown in trac ( cc:) are to long and not much of > interest > for other user. Could you please shorten them somehow that you do almost get > the > whole address. No. I will not patch the Trac code. You need to ask Trac team about that.

[josm-dev] email addresses in trac

2010-03-04 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I think the addresses shown in trac ( cc:) are to long and not much of interest for other user. Could you please shorten them somehow that you do almost get the whole address. It is also not really obvious that you can use your user-name instead of