Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?

2012-07-13 Thread Vincent Privat
Hi, I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Vincent 2012/7/12 Paul Hartmann phaau...@googlemail.com Hi, In the process of the license switch, there has

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?

2012-07-13 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Vincent Privat wrote: I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Volunteers are always accepted. Feel free to modify the wiki schedule

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?

2012-07-13 Thread Paul Hartmann
2012/7/13 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Vincent Privat wrote: I think we should enter in stabilization phase ASAP. I should have some time this week-end to run extensive tests, so a stable version released next week sounds a good idea to me. Volunteers are

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version after API change fix?

2012-07-13 Thread Vincent Privat
Alright :) Stabilization begins now. Objective: release on Wednesday. ___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-03-09 Thread Upliner
I see the current tested is 3965. Please bump it to 3966, fix #6049 was done in haste, so I forgot about negative numbers. 2011/3/7 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-03-07 Thread Sebastian Klein
Dirk Stöcker wrote: Hello, The 5th of March should be the next release of a josm tested. Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Gruß, Sebastian

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-03-07 Thread Sebastian Klein
Sebastian Klein wrote: Dirk Stöcker wrote: Hello, The 5th of March should be the next release of a josm tested. Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr?

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-03-07 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: Wo hakt es denn? Bitte die Fristen nicht so unkommentiert verstreichen lassen... Fixed. 3961 is tested now. Was meinst du eigentlich mit 5.3 genau, die Version um 3 Uhr morgens oder die um 27 Uhr? Well, +/- 5 Days :-) Ciao --

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-02-26 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Dirk Stöcker wrote: 2. what parts of JOSM will not work as long as the server is down? Every automatism (update-list, plugins-list, style-list, help and start page), and Yahoo download. For all of these users would need to do the manual way - download and install :-)

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-02-26 Thread Sebastian Klein
Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Please note also, that this week a new server infrastructure has been established. JOSM mappaint styles, mapcss styles and JOSM presets can now be made in the JOSM Trac wiki pages. Assuming there was some catastrophic server failure, and further

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-02-26 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011, Sebastian Klein wrote: JOSM runs just fine without the josm.openstreetmap.de server. Dirk listed most of the server dependent services, let me add that it can't update the list of available wms/tms urls Ooops, forgot that one. Probably because I never had trouble with it

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2011-02-25 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: Please note also, that this week a new server infrastructure has been established. JOSM mappaint styles, mapcss styles and JOSM presets can now be made in the JOSM Trac wiki pages. Assuming there was some catastrophic server failure, and further assuming that you are

Re: [josm-dev] new tested version?

2011-01-01 Thread Sebastian Klein
Hi, Happy new year to everyone! Version 3751 is set to tested; the stabilization phase was long enough, we can start with new development right now! I'm still a little enthusiastic about the fact we can use Bing imagery and that it's properly build into JOSM, now. :-) Thanks to everyone who made

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-10-09 Thread Olivier Cédric
Le 07/10/2010 08:56, Dirk Stöcker a écrit : On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: if no new bugs show up, I will make 3589 tested tomorrow. 3592 is new tested now. Ciao Josm 3592 is now available on fedora repository. To try it : yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install josm

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-10-07 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: if no new bugs show up, I will make 3589 tested tomorrow. 3592 is new tested now. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)___ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/6 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: Do we wait for bug reports by users of the new tested and how long shall we wait before adding new stuff? 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It can't be that bad. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread André Riedel
2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been closed as irreproducible. It

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread Sebastian Klein
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2010/9/8 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, André Riedel wrote: 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) A little but nasty bug. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/5397 This one has been

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-08 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/8 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com: This is news to me, would be best to have a trac ticket for it, but anyway: I thought to remember there was one for this. As a quick diagnosis you could observe the content of the autosave folder in the josm preferences directory

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-06 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: as we forgot the tested release in August, we now can schedule a new release in time for September. So please prepare everything for a new release in first week of September. Any objections against 3514 as tested? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-06 Thread Sebastian Klein
Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Dirk Stöcker wrote: as we forgot the tested release in August, we now can schedule a new release in time for September. So please prepare everything for a new release in first week of September. Any objections against 3514 as tested? Ciao No. Do

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-09-06 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Sebastian Klein wrote: Do we wait for bug reports by users of the new tested and how long shall we wait before adding new stuff? 1-2 days, but I don't expect serious bugs - we usually get these in latest already :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-08-27 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-08-25 15:18, Sebastian Klein wrote: The problem is, plugins are loaded first, so they win. :) It is not hard to fix the plugins that try to grab a well known shortcut, but we have to know about it! Please create a ticket on trac, if you find

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-08-25 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/8/25 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the shortcut-issues might come from plugins. Please do not allow to plugins to redefine already in use major shortcuts like a, s, d, x, j, p, c, m, etc. Its horrible

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-08-25 Thread Sebastian Klein
Stephan Knauss wrote: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'm talking about plugins that redefine common standard keys. That is IMHO bad for the usability. Is this possible? I always thought that once a shortcut is defined it can only be changed by the user. First one wins... The problem is,

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-08-25 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/8/26 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com: It is not hard to fix the plugins that try to grab a well known shortcut, but we have to know about it! Please create a ticket on trac, if you find such a case. done cheers, Martin ___ josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-04-06 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rolf Bode-Meyer schrieb: time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Yes, besides the particular bugs colliar already mentioned there are other blockers in

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-04-05 Thread Rolf Bode-Meyer
time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Yes, besides the particular bugs colliar already mentioned there are other blockers in Trac. Either they're real blockers or not. If the former, release is impossible

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-04-05 Thread Sebastian Klein
Pieren wrote: On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.dewrote: Hello, time for next release is reached. Any objections against releasing current latest as tested and move on with JAVA6 from now on? Ciao I have submitted a patch 5 weeks ago for a change in

Re: [josm-dev] New Tested

2010-04-03 Thread colliar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Thanks for your work and thanks for asking. Yes I do: #4791, #4795, #4818 only happen to me with unstable. #4366 and #4675 are still not fixed ?! cu colliar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version

2009-08-21 Thread Sebastian Waschik
Hello, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de writes: I know it is always more fun to develop fancy new stuff (and Karl's stuff are big improvements for josm), but keeping the bugs low is also important. So I would be happy if some more people keep an eye on the bug tracker and fix this or

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version

2009-08-20 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Christoph Eckert wrote: I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version

2009-08-19 Thread André Riedel
2009/8/19 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de: I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the

Re: [josm-dev] New tested version

2009-08-19 Thread Christoph Eckert
Hi, I made 1981 new tested. Looking to the latest changelog, tells me that there are some minor changes/patches which should not be unfixed for the net month. So it is probably better to set the tomorrow version as the next tested version of the month. phew, I did some last minute changes