On 7/10/19 2:40 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I am not familiar with tfwx. I would guess wildly that it's an XML
> version of tfw, because a file with a few numbers isn't cool anymore.
a tfwx file is similar in appearance to a tfw file, but is interpreted
differently. the following stackexchange
Richard Welty writes:
> is this practical? image import wants a tfw file which i don't have;
> i have the tfwx and aux files instead.
I am not familiar with tfwx. I would guess wildly that it's an XML
version of tfw, because a file with a few numbers isn't cool anymore.
The longstanding
is this practical? image import wants a tfw file which i don't have;
i have the tfwx and aux files instead.
thanks,
richard
--
rwe...@averillpark.net
Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting
OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux
Java - Web Applications - Search