Re: [josm-dev] Preset link usability

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
I agree. It is faster to find. Igor Shubovych 2009/1/23 Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de Am 22.01.2009 14:40, Claudius Henrichs: I would like to beautify the recently introduced link to the map features page in the tagging presets by using a clickable link text. I would need to add

Re: [josm-dev] Preset link using JLinkLabel

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
Not really, When I pressed Open in browser in my Ubuntu, it showed me Firefox. And it is become active application. Igor Shubovych 2009/1/23 Shaun McDonald o...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk On 23 Jan 2009, at 07:47, Dirk Stöcker wrote: On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Claudius Henrichs wrote: please

Re: [josm-dev] Cleaning up the motd

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
Also it would be nice, it the motd would get downloaded asynchronously. +1 I was wondered why JOSM starts so slowly. One day I didn't have Internet at all and it started in a second. Maybe it is better to cache the MOTD, and if server doesn't reply for 5 seconds show old cached MOTD. Or

Re: [josm-dev] bug in JOSM - moving objects introduces scaling

2009-01-25 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Tobias Wendorff wrote: Oookay ... the scaling is pretty low, but I would like to fix it. Could anyone tell me, where duplication is calculated? I think it is implemented as a copypaste action, which BTW also has a ticket in the bugtracker, as it destroys the clipboard

[josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Andre Hinrichs
Hi List, there is a compile error with Java 1.5 and SVN version 1339. With java 1.6 there are some (other) warnings but the build succeeds. $ ant dist Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/hinrichs/projekte/josm/build [mkdir] Created dir:

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Andre Hinrichs wrote: there is a compile error with Java 1.5 and SVN version 1339. With java 1.6 there are some (other) warnings but the build succeeds. I already feared that patch may have some 1.6 stuff. Can you fix it? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Dirk Stöcker wrote: I already feared that patch may have some 1.6 stuff. Can you fix it? Igor had submitted that patch to me on 08-12-30 and I wrote to him that it is not Java 1.5 compatible and I cannot apply it because of this. Igor wrote on 09-01-08 that he had fixed the 1.5

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
Andre, Which JDK do you have? I set up Java compiler compliance level to Java 5. For all and for classes too. So it should be ok. Igor Shubovych 2009/1/25 Andre Hinrichs andre.hinri...@gmx.de Hi List, there is a compile error with Java 1.5 and SVN version 1339. With java 1.6 there are

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Jiri Klement
Setting up compiler compliance is not enough. You have to use JDK 1.5 compiler to make sure you don't use any Java 1.6 api. Anyway is Java 5 support still necessary? Java 6 seems to be available on most computers now. On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Igor Shubovych igor.shubov...@gmail.com

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
Sorry for my mistakes. I created patch for Java 5 fix. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/attachment/ticket/1988/toolbar_preferences_java5_fix.patch It should fix that. Guys who has Java 5, please test it, because I didn't succeed to start JOSM with JDK 5 on my Ubuntu (it compiles but shows empty

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Andre Hinrichs
Hi, sorry, was away for a while. On Sonntag, 25. Januar 2009, Igor Shubovych wrote: Sorry for my mistakes. I created patch for Java 5 fix. http://josm.openstreetmap.de/attachment/ticket/1988/toolbar_preferences_java5_fix.patch It should fix that. Guys who has Java 5, please test it,

Re: [josm-dev] Java 1.5 compile error

2009-01-25 Thread Igor Shubovych
Hello, 2009/1/26 Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Igor Shubovych wrote: I set up Java compiler compliance level to Java 5. For all and for classes too. So it should be ok. Sad but true it is not. The only chance to find the problem is usage of Java 1.5