On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
The idea behind this is that users actually fix these issues. When we no
longer display them, then they wont get fixed at all. The system has
already been tuned a lot,
Exactly. This is what the newbie will think as well: The system has been
tuned
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Pierre Béland wrote:
This over verification may become counterproductive since contributors
may have the reaction to always ignore validation messages.
People tend to ignore warning dialogs in every type of software. JOSM
probably is no big exception to this.
Ciao
--
Is it possible to make an option for the validator so that you can
choose between validating only touched objects and all objects?
Then put it default on only touched objects for new installations so
that newbies only see the errors on objects they actually touched.
Regards,
Maarten
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Is it possible to make an option for the validator so that you can choose
between validating only touched objects and all objects?
Then put it default on only touched objects for new installations so that
newbies only see the
From: Maarten Deen [mailto:md...@xs4all.nl]
Subject: Re: [josm-dev] Validator
Is it possible to make an option for the validator so that you can
choose between validating only touched objects and all objects?
Then put it default on only touched objects for new installations so
that newbies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/07/12 08:36, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Pierre Béland wrote:
This over verification may become counterproductive since contributors
may have the reaction to always ignore validation messages.
People tend to ignore
Hi,
In the process of the license switch, there has been a small change of
the OSM API [1]. This causes JOSM to crash in certain situations
[2][3]. A fix has been committed (v. 5326), so as a user you might
want to update JOSM or at least save often, especially before upload
and data update.
2012/7/11 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Do you think it would be possible to run the validator after data has been
downloaded and record the list of problems, and then when someone uploads,
only check for *newly added* problems instead of everything?
Of course the validator would still,
