[josm-dev] Early Access build 83 for JDK 9 and JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw are available for download.

[Rory O'Donnell]

Hi Vincent,

JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw Early Access build b83 is available for 
download at jdk9.java.net/jigsaw .


Notable changes:

 * The -Xoverride option has been extended and renamed to -Xpatch, and
   the -XaddReads option has been restored [1] (changesets
   04dd0430530e, 095fc622bf01).
 * ClassLoader::getPackage now works as it did previously, walking the
   class-loader hierarchy in order to find Package objects, which
   enables NetBeans to start up [2] (5805781b9370).
 * Class::getResource will now return a URL to a resource in a module,
   when invoked from code within that module (0fbe4c72638a).
 * The big module-summary table has been improved, and will now be
   posted with each build [3] (e922b207c170).


JDK 9 Early Access build b83 is available for download 
 , summary of  changes are listed here 
.


 * Request for G1 GC Feedback at wiki -
   https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/HotSpot/G1GC+Feedback
 * This wiki-page aims to outline the basic JVM parameters switching to
   G1GC, and how you can help collecting data comparing the G1GC and
   Parallel GC.

Rgds, Rory

[1]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-September/004740.html
[2]http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2015-September/004730.html
[3]http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jigsaw/ea/module-summary.html


--
Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA , Dublin, Ireland

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Vincent Privat]

2015-10-09 21:44 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :

> We still don't have JCS packaged for Debian, but thanks to Emmanuel
> Bourg there is some progress on this front with the upload of the jcache
> spec.
>
> I'm currently working on updating the JOSM package to 8800 using the
> embedded JCS and newer metadata-extractor version.
>
>
Great news!
___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Dirk Stöcker]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:


No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the SVN
text. This patch as far as I remember was designed in cooperation with
me. For SVN we react different in tickets - We tell the user first to
update to recent SVN version assuming the user can build the software
himself. This is not the correct reply for Debian version, so the SVN
should not be there. Simply change the patch to set "Debian" instead of
"SVN", as I see that there is no patch in the GIT yet for this purpose.


Based on the bug report and your changes to the VersionTest macro, it
seemed the patch may have been unneeded in the first place.

I prefer the User-Agent without SVN substring anyway, so I'll happily
keep it for the Debian package.

The Debian Build-Name change is currently only available in the
00-build.patch on the stretch branch:

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/josm.git/tree/debian/patches/00-build.patch?h=stretch#n57


Hmm, maybe these two together need some rework. If you simply change 
Is-Local-Build (above the Build-Name) to false the patch to Version.java 
can be dropped and manifest is more correct.


Removing SVN from the other line in build.xml is probably still required 
(we don't use build.xml but a makefile on the server). But I'd include 
that single change in your 00-build.patch for better readability.


Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

[josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

Is the source for the JOSM Version check, the VersionTest macro used in
StartupPageSource wiki, available somewhere?

It currently is unable to handle the version used for the Debian package
which is reported as a strange version:

 '8159 Debian nl) Linux Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid'

This was triggered by the addition of the Build-Name property to better
identify the Debian builds.

I suspect that the VersionTest regex doesn't support the use of the
Build-Name property.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

On 09-10-15 17:39, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>> Works now? Please check that it checks against tested and does not
>> tell to update unless there's really a newer one. SVN version already
>> tell you to update when a new latest is there.
> 
> Need to correct me. For SVN it only tells you to update when you are
> least 50 versions behind. So it can't be tested ATM, as tested to latest
> diff is only 40.

Thanks for the quick fixes, the Startup page now reports:

 * Active version '8159 Debian' should be updated! The current stable
   snapshot is 8800 and 8840 is the unstable development version.

This is for http.agent:

'JOSM/1.5 (8159 Debian en) Linux Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid)'

The Debian package carries a very old patch [0] that strips the addition
of the SVN substring for local builds to fix Debian Bug #598920 [1]. We
may need to consider dropping that patch now.

What are your thoughts about that?

[0]
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/josm.git/tree/debian/patches/05-fix_version.patch
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/598920

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

On 09-10-15 21:27, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for the quick fixes, the Startup page now reports:
>>
>> * Active version '8159 Debian' should be updated! The current stable
>>   snapshot is 8800 and 8840 is the unstable development version.
> 
> Well yes, that will remain a Debian problem. Will you ever get a version
> where the Wiki will not ask for an update with our monthly cycle :-)

We still don't have JCS packaged for Debian, but thanks to Emmanuel
Bourg there is some progress on this front with the upload of the jcache
spec.

I'm currently working on updating the JOSM package to 8800 using the
embedded JCS and newer metadata-extractor version.

>> The Debian package carries a very old patch [0] that strips the addition
>> of the SVN substring for local builds to fix Debian Bug #598920 [1]. We
>> may need to consider dropping that patch now.
>>
>> What are your thoughts about that?
> 
> No. As you mark it as Debian in the agent it's correct to strip the SVN
> text. This patch as far as I remember was designed in cooperation with
> me. For SVN we react different in tickets - We tell the user first to
> update to recent SVN version assuming the user can build the software
> himself. This is not the correct reply for Debian version, so the SVN
> should not be there. Simply change the patch to set "Debian" instead of
> "SVN", as I see that there is no patch in the GIT yet for this purpose.

Based on the bug report and your changes to the VersionTest macro, it
seemed the patch may have been unneeded in the first place.

I prefer the User-Agent without SVN substring anyway, so I'll happily
keep it for the Debian package.

The Debian Build-Name change is currently only available in the
00-build.patch on the stretch branch:

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/josm.git/tree/debian/patches/00-build.patch?h=stretch#n57

These changes are also in my local master branch that I'll push to the
git repository on Alioth soon after finishing the changes for JOSM 8800.

> But you can drop "08-disable_gettext-merge.patch". That speed issue has
> been fixed some time ago.

That patch has also been disabled some time ago, as part of the changes
for JOSM 8800 these old disabled patches are now removed entirely, not
just disabled in the series file.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Dirk Stöcker]

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:


Is the source for the JOSM Version check, the VersionTest macro used in
StartupPageSource wiki, available somewhere?


Yes. But not public :-)


It currently is unable to handle the version used for the Debian package
which is reported as a strange version:

'8159 Debian nl) Linux Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid'

This was triggered by the addition of the Build-Name property to better
identify the Debian builds.


Works now? Please check that it checks against tested and does not tell to 
update unless there's really a newer one. SVN version already tell you 
to update when a new latest is there.



I suspect that the VersionTest regex doesn't support the use of the
Build-Name property.


Nah, it was hardcoded to only "SVN". Sometimes it seems brain is turned 
off when writing such code.


Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev

Re: [josm-dev] JOSM Version check source (VersionTest macro) to troubleshoot strange version

[Dirk Stöcker]

Hello,

Works now? Please check that it checks against tested and does not tell to 
update unless there's really a newer one. SVN version already tell you to 
update when a new latest is there.


Need to correct me. For SVN it only tells you to update when you are least 
50 versions behind. So it can't be tested ATM, as tested to latest diff is 
only 40.


Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)

___
josm-dev mailing list
josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev