Re: [josm-dev] Updating Plugin handling (#2530)

2009-05-05 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote: Hello, is there someone here who has time and feels like fixing following bug: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/2530 Essentially this is removing the HTML/XML loading and replacing it with loading the manifest

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Henrik Niehaus
Henrik Niehaus schrieb: Hi JOSM coders, I came across several problems and feature requests for GPX files while looking at the bug tracker and reading this list. So I decided to learn a new technology and gave JAXB a try. The result is a JOSM, which fully supports GPX 1.0 and 1.1, because

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Russ Nelson
Henrik Niehaus writes: No one interested? Is JAXB a separate library? How does this extra code affect the portability? -- --my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com Cloudmade supports http://openstreetmap.org/ 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 |

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Greg Troxel
Henrik Niehaus henrik.nieh...@gmx.de writes: Cons: 1. JOSM depends on JAXB - 5 jars with a total size of 1MiB (for JDK 1.5. JDK 1.6 comes with JAXB) 2. It's a big patch and might need some time to get everything (including plugins) back to work 3. New bugs, which made their way in the new

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Henrik Niehaus
Russ Nelson schrieb: Henrik Niehaus writes: No one interested? Is JAXB a separate library? How does this extra code affect the portability? If you use Java = 1.5, JAXB is a separate library. Java 1.6 includes a JAXB implementation. Portability in terms of runnable on Win, Mac, Linux?

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Frederik Ramm
Henrik, No one interested? I read your post and I didn't like it, but did not want to spoil your fun. First of all, JOSM is not a playground for trying out new technologies. If there's a good reason for introducing something new (and the increased complexity that comes with it) then fine.

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Russ Nelson
Henrik Niehaus writes: Russ Nelson schrieb: Henrik Niehaus writes: No one interested? Is JAXB a separate library? How does this extra code affect the portability? If you use Java = 1.5, JAXB is a separate library. Java 1.6 includes a JAXB implementation.

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Russ Nelson wrote: Portability in terms of runnable on Win, Mac, Linux? JAXB is pure Java and depends on Java 1.5, so it should run on any platform, which supports Java 1.5 or better. Sounds like this patch would cause JOSM to not work under Java 1.5. I suggest that we not use

Re: [josm-dev] New GPX implementation

2009-05-05 Thread Brett Henderson
Frederik Ramm wrote: We don't normally develop stuff for future use because in 90% of cases it gets never used and just bloats the code. I'm not into GPX a lot; I load traces into JOSM and that's it. So if those who use GPX more than I do all say hooray, we've been waiting for these