Am Di, 8.12.2009, 08:51 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
The circle might not look like a real circle on your
screen but believe us it is a circle! ;-)
Exactly.
I recommend everyone to use the new UTM projection, since it's exemely
useful for most of our (micro-) mapping.
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Matthias Julius wrote:
What do you think?
It's funny you should say this - I am currently working on a few things such as
some proper geometry operations.
It started with me doing some work on the extrude function and realizing it
should really be able to work in
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi,
Matthias Julius wrote:
IMHO, all those calculations should ideally be done using great
circles.
I agree, but having implemented things like the (initial version of) the
make rectangular function, which was difficult enough the way it is, I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Matthias Julius wrote:
Ah, you mean that these calculations should always be based on a
Mercator transformation even if you have something else selected.
Yes, Mercator or whatever is deemed the best approximation to reality
for a particular operation. Mercator might be
Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk writes:
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Matthias Julius wrote:
What do you think?
It's funny you should say this - I am currently working on a few
things such as some proper geometry operations.
It started with me doing some work on the extrude function and
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Matthias Julius wrote:
I guess local cartesian coordinates would be the best for things like
orthogonalize since that's the way buildings are built. But, in
practice, using Mercator should be close enough for real world
building sizes.
Close enough maybe, but I
Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk writes:
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Matthias Julius wrote:
In other words: if the current projection makes circles look like
eggs then I would expect this to be true for both the imagery and
the circles created by AlignInCircleAction.
Yes, I understand
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Tobias Wendorff wrote:
I did the same, aprox. a year ago, but I don't have a clue, how
to implement it in JAVA.
Neither did I. I'm a c++ programmer, I just dived straight in. It's pretty
straightforward, but painfully long-winded in areas for a higher-level
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
interesting post by Matt on this blog:
http://www.asklater.com/matt/wordpress/2009/12/editor-retention/
He arrives at the result that JOSM users are the ones most likely to
stay with their editor. (Well... what else is
Paul Johnson wrote:
created_by= tags get stomped by Potlatch, JOSM leaves it alone if it's
already set (unless, of course, a JOSM user deliberately deletes the
existing created_by tags). This would give severely skewed results in
favor of Potlatch.
You would be correct, if you would've said
10 matches
Mail list logo
