Fixed, replied on new forum with details.
On Jan 17, 11:23 am, Kevin Dalman wrote:
> I cross-posted this on the NEW jQuery forum as well...
>
> http://forum.jquery.com/#Topic/1473700616772
>
> On Jan 17, 7:59 am, Kevin Dalman wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > If a UI widget like Tabs or Accordion is insi
Thax,
First the excuses. This is a discussion about the future.
However, this future is in front of us.
Browser's between incompatibility in ajax was need JS Library /
jQuery, and was very helpful. It is, I agree.
But even if there is compatibility, jQuery support of xhr is useful.
Future brows
Hi Jon,
I just listened to the podcast where you mention your work on mobile
support and wanted to say that in my explorations on the same topic I
think I have found that hover is actually usable on those blackberries
that support haptic feedback.
On the one that I got to use for 2mins I had to p
Hey Guys;
I am having some issues attempting to bind a slideshow function to a
to div that lives within ajax loaded content.
Some quick info about what i am attempting.
- Portfolio Menu, click each title to load
- on click, load new portfolio peice(i.e website-name.html)
- Within website-name.htm
The bug happens due to the fact, that jQuery "cleans up the event in
case it is reused" in his trigger method (e.target = elem). If a
change is detected the current implementation calls trigger with the
element as the elem-argument for trigger. (with live: in most cases
the document/with bind: in m
I just pushed a fix for this (adding 'l' to the var declaration). Good
catch! (I'd link to Github but it appears to be down.)
--John
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:08 AM, philipp:s wrote:
> There is a bug on line 2392 and 2411: var is missing:
>
> for ( var i = 0, l = match.length; i < l; i
Let me summarize this thread so far.
DBJ brought up the idea of a lint for jQuery, which comes up a few
times a year. I mentioned I had posted about that in 2006 and didn't
finish any code to do it. A few people said it was a horrible idea and
they would never use it. Others said they liked the id
I don't like the idea. At this point there is no reason to believe that
any browser with WebSockets implemented will break spec and need a
compatibility layer (the primary reason jQuery has ajax). I don't see
how jQuery could add any functionality to WebSockets, the api is already
quite nice, n
There is a bug on line 2392 and 2411: var is missing:
for ( var i = 0, l = match.length; i < l; i++ ) {
for ( j in live ) {
fn = live[j];
elem = match[i].elem;
related = null;
i
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:59 PM, ScottChiefBaker wrote:
> http://jsbin.com/ovemo
>
> toggle('slow') and slideToggle('slow') both do the same thing. Is this
> somehow related to "display: block" on the sliding image? Is there
> another way to slide in and out the last cell of the table? Or is this
Well, I $.ws.send("my hope into the future") :-)
Still, It's ridiculously fast.
more asynchronous javascript + sockets
It's so just Cloud.
On Jan 19, 12:37 am, Sidney San Martín wrote:
> IIRC the jQuery team said that Web Socket features aren't being
> considered right now because very few bro
IIRC the jQuery team said that Web Socket features aren't being
considered right now because very few browsers support them, and
equally few website take or plan to take advantage of them in the near
future. It's not worth the space to put support in every copy of
jQuery.
jQuery is also most usefu
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:23 AM, asharjqry wrote:
> I am new to JQury. And curretnly I am using Jquery 'Column Navigation'
> plugin (from http://source.polaris-digital.com/column-navigation/) to create
> a dynamic file tree.
This list is for discussions of the development of jQuery itself.
You'll
Added TRAC ticket: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5851
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@goo
I provided a ticket on jquery dev but maybe posting here too is
better.
The ticket is http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/5845
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-...@googlegroups.com.
To uns
On Jan 18, 2010, at 5:43 AM, matiasnu wrote:
On Jan 15, 9:54 pm, Leeoniya wrote:
that seems like a mistake. wonder if it has been documented like this
since 1.3, cause it looks like it was just copied and pasted over. as
far as i know 1.3.2 never supported multiple events.
Yes, it doesn't w
My misstake. It "almost works.
If we run this on a page where content doesn't come via ajax, it
doesn't work!
Also it's not enough just to run this.live() on "none ajax content"
either, but when we chain bind and live it works.
//Mattias
On 18 Jan, 11:51, Mattias Hallström wrote:
> We have the
WebSockets is very faster than xhr. I think jQuery had better support
WebSockets in Core.
The following Samples of text mining are speed comparison, WS vs XHR.
at my Office(same bloga.jp), the speed difference was following.
/* need Chrome4.0.249.0 + or Safari nightly */
http://bloga.jp/ws/jq/
We have the same problem, but found out that it works if we chain bind
and live like this:
this.bind("change", function(e){
// Do nothing
}).live("change", function(e){
});
Not sure why though?!
//Mattias
On 16 Jan, 14:34, mape wrote:
> The example works fine in Firefox
On Jan 15, 9:54 pm, Leeoniya wrote:
> that seems like a mistake. wonder if it has been documented like this
> since 1.3, cause it looks like it was just copied and pasted over. as
> far as i know 1.3.2 never supported multiple events.
Yes, it doesn't work in 1.4. I still have to chain multiple li
20 matches
Mail list logo
