Anko -
You're welcome to file a bug on XHTML support - let me know when you
do. I have it penciled in the Roadmap for jQuery 1.4 - but it's going
to require a lot of work (basic things like innerHTML aren't
guaranteed to work, for example) - not to mention that things like
attributes and expandos
Is there a ticket associated with this bug? I'm dealing with the same
issue myself.
It's frustrating because i need to serve as application/xhtml+xml so
that I can put svg on the page.
On Feb 14, 12:52 am, John Resig wrote:
> Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces it in to
Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces it in to
the XML mode where everything becomes 'fun'.
--John
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, David Zhou wrote:
>
> http://media.nodnod.net/test.html works for me. Is it because I'm not
> serving the page as application/xhtml+xml?
http://media.nodnod.net/test.html works for me. Is it because I'm not
serving the page as application/xhtml+xml?
-- dz
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Dave Methvin wrote:
>
> Me too.
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/
> 2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR
Me too.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/
2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this gr
> In that link, I see the alert from catch in Firefox 3 with the same
> failure code that David mentioned earlier.
Well, the difference should be that the error isn't coming from jQuery
- this is purely a DOM/Firefox weird interaction here. It looks like
its rejecting the namespace - and because
In that link, I see the alert from catch in Firefox 3 with the same
failure code that David mentioned earlier.
-- dz
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:15 AM, John Resig wrote:
>
> I've set up a test page and no possible combination that I try works:
> http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/xmlns/
>
> In
I've set up a test page and no possible combination that I try works:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/xmlns/
Including the basic one:
var div = document.createElement("div");
div.innerHTML = 'Hi';
It sounds like there's another issue at play.
--John
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:43 AM, David
I set a breakpoint at line 899 and inspected the div variable. It
seems to be bound a phantom document that does not have any attributes
(e.g., the xmlns:lift="..." attribute).
This div is created in line 850 (div = context.createElement("div");)
Hope this helps.
On Feb 12, 9:24 pm, David Poll
On Feb 12, 7:37 pm, John Resig wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if this is something that's blockUI-specific.
> What happens if you do:
> $("#hi").html('Hi');
That fails in the same way on line 899 of jQuery 1.3.1.
>
> Inside your try/catch.
>
> --John
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:08 PM, D
I'm trying to figure out if this is something that's blockUI-specific.
What happens if you do:
$("#hi").html('Hi');
Inside your try/catch.
--John
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:08 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 6:09 pm, John Resig wrote:
>> > "application/xhtml+xml"
>>
>> What do yo
On Feb 12, 6:09 pm, John Resig wrote:
> > "application/xhtml+xml"
>
> What do you do for the other browsers? (IE)
The XHTML is sent through a quirks mode rewriter for IE and served as
text/html
>
> >> 2) Self-closing script tags are invalid (may want to fix those first).
>
> > Why are they in
> "application/xhtml+xml"
What do you do for the other browsers? (IE)
>> 2) Self-closing script tags are invalid (may want to fix those first).
>
> Why are they invalid for xhtml?
Dunno, but they are:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_3
--John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
On Feb 12, 1:49 pm, John Resig wrote:
> 1) What mimetype are you serving this with?
"application/xhtml+xml"
> 2) Self-closing script tags are invalid (may want to fix those first).
Why are they invalid for xhtml?
>
> --John
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Pollak
>
> wrote:
>
> >
1) What mimetype are you serving this with?
2) Self-closing script tags are invalid (may want to fix those first).
--John
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:43 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I use and *love* jQuery. I also run the Lift web framework project.
> In Lift, we use jQuery and we us
On Feb 12, 10:49 am, Leonardo Rossetti wrote:
> what is the purpose of this try-catch block?
To catch and display the exception.
If the try/catch block is omitted, the problem still ocurs, but is
silently discarded (unless you've got Firebug running.)
>
> 2009/2/12 David Pollak
>
>
>
>
>
>
what is the purpose of this try-catch block?
2009/2/12 David Pollak
>
> Folks,
>
> I use and *love* jQuery. I also run the Lift web framework project.
> In Lift, we use jQuery and we use XHTML namespaces (we need to
> decorate certain XHTML elements with lift:gc attributes.)
>
> We've run into
17 matches
Mail list logo