There are two "main points" here: terminology and reliability.
http://dbj.org/dbj/?p=270
(sorry for a blog plug )
typeof( window.alert ) === 'object' is going head-on towards browser
(+OS) differences so, same as ECMA comitee, I have no resources to
"solve" that one ...
--DBJ
On Aug 1, 3:16 p
I solved it already, have you tried my snippet to understand native IE
functions?
Native IE functions have these "features"
- they are not instanteof Function
- they are not instanceof Object
- accordingly, they have not a toString method, decompilation is in this
case safe enough
- you cannot
As summary
return !!obj && typeof obj.toString === "undefined" &&
/^\s*\bfunction\b/.test(obj);
with a given IE function, it should not fail. Other browsers can use the
good old "[object Function]" trick.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
I think we all know that In IE, typeof window.alert , returns “object”
Here is my portable isFunction() , IMHO it might be ine of the
simplest solutions that I have seen?
// GPL (c) 2009 by DBJ.ORG
var isFunction = typeof (top.alert) == "object" ?
function(x) {
your proposal in IE
var s = "this is a string with function word";
isFunction(s) // true
cool!!!
now, re-consider that we all like reliable code and your code as is is the
less reliable ever for its purpose in IE. I gonna probably create a post in
WR 'cause where you think "small and simple is
jQuery had that sort of checks and fairly dumped them in 1.3:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3#Changes
> .isFunction is simpler now, it no longer handles some strange edge cases (in
> favor of simplicity and performance).
By the way, ‘x instanceof Function’ leaks for window and DOM obj
Thanks for your reply, John.
Do you have any idea on an ETA for 1.3.3? If it is soonish, I'd
prefer to wait for that release and then update our test system to
that version so that we the most current version of jquery.
Thanks again,
Clint
On Jul 31, 6:43 am, John Resig wrote:
> I've looked
I'm receiving the error "access to restricted uri denied line 3395"
Making an ajax call to a web service using jQuery. The web service
resides on a server that also has a javascript file with calls to the
various web methods. Each web method has a corresponding javascript
function that calls (expo
try changing the datatype to 'jsonp'
On Aug 3, 12:10 pm, ccha wrote:
> I'm receiving the error "access to restricted uri denied line 3395"
> Making an ajax call to a web service using jQuery. The web service
> resides on a server that also has a javascript file with calls to the
> various web me
We're shooting for something before the end of the month.
--John
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Clint Talbert (Mozilla Address) <
ctalb...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply, John.
>
> Do you have any idea on an ETA for 1.3.3? If it is soonish, I'd
> prefer to wait for that release
Hello.
While developing a site for a client I made a page where I hid all the
div:s with the class news_container like this
$('.news_container:not(:first)').hide();
This works great in Mozilla and Safari 4 (I haven't tried Chrome yet)
but both Safari 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 hide all the div:s, including
All Salsa isFunction and isIENativeFunction
http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/08/isfunction-or-isienativefunction.html
Both proposal, you decide ;-)
Best Regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hello.I try to use the fisheye menu downloaded from :http://
interface.eyecon.ro/with the smartmenu from:http://
www.smartmenus.org on the same page.The problem i have is that if the
SM is direct above the fisheye menu and has submenus that hover the
fisheye menu,than when the mouse is over th
Indeed, we dropped this consciously and we don't plan to re-add it.
--
Ariel Flesler
On Aug 3, 2:00 pm, Azat Razetdinov wrote:
> jQuery had that sort of checks and fairly dumped them in 1.3:
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3#Changes
>
> > .isFunction is simpler now, it no longer han
Ariel not sure you read my post already, what I am talking about is an
isIECallable function that could be a part from isFunction (I used
isIENativeFunction but it does not matter the name, it can be only less than
100 characters and nothing else)
Regards
--~--~-~--~~~
I was actually replying to Azat but yes, I read your post.
Your code is cool, not that different from the one we had back then,
written by John.
The thing is, how often would you actually call isFunction on alert(,
confirm, etc) or a DOM element's method. You certainly won't be
passing those as a
16 matches
Mail list logo
