[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-06-30 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
I am not able to reproduce this, see the following drip leak screengrab. http://gyazo.com/579a64dc877016ae6d079228fc863728.png Although memory increases quickly to begin with the gc seems to kick in at regular intervals leaving a relatively stable footprint. That seems fine to me considering the

[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-06-30 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
me in > IE-sans-sp and IEsp1. > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051090/how-can-i-control-ie6jquer... > > Thanks, > Michael Haren > > On Jun 30, 8:01 am, "jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com" > > wrote: > > I am not able to reproduce this, se

[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-06-30 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
www.picvault.info/images/537090308_omoya.png > > On Jun 30, 10:12 am, "jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com" > > wrote: > > Sorry should have included that info also, see > > herehttp://gyazo.com/e4ec10e5ae13df428349c1b8f567214d.png. > > > Cheers > > &

[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-06-30 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
a now-public pagehttp://jsbin.com/omoya > > http://www.picvault.info/images/537090308_omoya.png > > On Jun 30, 10:12 am, "jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com" > > wrote: > > Sorry should have included that info also, see > > herehttp://gyazo.com/e4ec10e5ae13d

[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-06-30 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
roduce some of the behavior (edited or > > otherwise)--I'm not going crazy! > > > I've read that removing elements makes the problem worse and that > > setting the .html to "" is better. I think .empty() does that. I > > wonder what happens if you

[jquery-dev] Re: IE6 memory leak

2009-07-01 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
Anybody else care about the above issues? On Jun 30, 6:55 pm, "jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com" wrote: > It happened using ie also and monitoring in task manager/perfmon > > On Jun 30, 5:41 pm, mharen wrote: > > > I'm not sure drip is a good tool for this job.

[jquery-dev] Re: plz update nightly

2009-12-13 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
Yeah, something like Team City or a.n other CI server would be a great addition. They can watch for git commits, then run ant tasks to build and automate the running of the unit tests - if all pass - minify it up and place in nightly build folder. On Dec 12, 4:02 pm, alexander farkas wrote: > Yo

[jquery-dev] 1.4 Live issue with multiple event types

2010-01-15 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
It appears adding trying to delegate multiple event types to live in one statement is not supported. With $('selector').live('keyup keydown', fn); the func is fired outside of the selections. Test case http://pastebin.me/2796fa93b74138794e94d2f7d75ea29c -- You received this message because you

[jquery-dev] Re: 1.4 Live issue with multiple event types

2010-01-15 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
No, The site was built with jquery 1.3.1. The site uses an iframe that links to 1.4. On Jan 15, 3:19 pm, jerome wrote: > Are you linking to jQuery 1.3.1 hosted by Google? > > On Jan 15, 9:23 am, "jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com" > > > > wrote: > > It appea

[jquery-dev] Re: 1.4 Live issue with multiple event types

2010-01-15 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
Yup - in the API docs here - http://api.jquery.com/live/ eventType - A string containing one or more JavaScript event types, such as "click" or "keydown" On Jan 15, 5:39 pm, Dave Methvin wrote: > > > > With $('selector').live('keyup keydown', fn); the func is fired > > > > outside of the selecti

[jquery-dev] :eq(n) issue

2009-01-14 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
I think there is an issue with :eq(). Demo test case http://jsbin.com/omobe --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.co

[jquery-dev] Should fadeTo also show

2009-02-20 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
If I fadeOut an element then ask it to fadeTo at present the element remains with display:none. Should fadeTo auto set the element to visible first? Quick demo http://jsbin.com/ajegi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[jquery-dev] Re: Should fadeTo also show

2009-02-20 Thread jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com
as requested, cheers http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4204 On Feb 20, 3:25 pm, John Resig wrote: > Possibly. Could you file a ticket on it? > Thanks!http://dev.jquery.com/newticket > > --John > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, jquery.redsqu...@googlemail.com > > wrot