jQuery.com's homepage encourages using a gzipped version of jQuery. Why not advertise HTTP 1.1 deflate encoding instead? It is better. (even better than HTTP 1.1 deflate is sending raw deflate [without the zlib wrapper]).
I've done some research on this and posted the results here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1574168/gzip-vs-deflate-zlib-revisited Are there any reasons to _not_ encourage deflate over gzip?
