It may be too late, but I would recommend avoiding a call to an ASPX
page like that. Even though you're not using it, the entire ASP.NET
WebForms Page class is instantiated for any call to an ASPX page,
which has significant overhead.
An ASMX web service or ASHX handler would be much better choi
On Aug 12, 12:03 am, yi wrote:
> OK I will try "object of key/value pairs".
> You mean i should use "data:{Arg:args2} ". is it right?
Right :)
OK I will try "object of key/value pairs".
You mean i should use "data:{Arg:args2} ". is it right?
On Aug 12, 4:05 am, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Aug 11, 11:53 am, Jules wrote:
>
> > After re-reading the original post, it seems json is not required
>
> > just use
> > data:"Args="+args2
>
> Don't
Thanks Jules
that is really helpful.
thank you so much!!!
I konw what i am going to do now!!!
On Aug 11, 9:53 pm, Jules wrote:
> After re-reading the original post, it seems json is not required
>
> just use
> data:"Args="+args2
>
> on the server side
>
> StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(R
On Aug 11, 11:53 am, Jules wrote:
> After re-reading the original post, it seems json is not required
>
> just use
> data:"Args="+args2
Don't do that. If args2 contains any invalid characters (i.e. a space)
then this will fail, possibly in mysterious ways. Always send the data
as an object of ke
After re-reading the original post, it seems json is not required
just use
data:"Args="+args2
on the server side
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(Request.InputStream);
string param = reader.ReadToEnd();
param = "Args=abc" assuming args2="abc"
Just use split() to get the value.
On Aug
JavaScriptSerializer is included in AJAX 1.0. It is compatible
with .NET 2.0.
http://www.asp.net/ajax/downloads/archive/
You don't have to use the ajax component on your client to use it.
On Aug 11, 1:18 pm, yi wrote:
> Hi Jules:
> If i use old version of ASP.net, Can i Deserialize Json data?
Hi Jules:
If i use old version of ASP.net, Can i Deserialize Json data?
thanks Jules!!!
On Aug 11, 3:01 pm, Jules wrote:
> Opps,
> You are right, change the contentType to
>
> contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8"
>
> here is a snippet to handle generic json in C# .NET 3.5
>
> JavaScri
Opps,
You are right, change the contentType to
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8"
here is a snippet to handle generic json in C# .NET 3.5
JavaScriptSerializer ser = new JavaScriptSerializer();
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(Request.InputStream);
object input = ser.Deserializ
hi Jules:
I use Request("Arg") , but it doesn't work. it always give me empty
string
contentType: "text" is it right?
do i need make it contentType: "Json", ?
If i need use JSON, do you know how to read json data at sever side in
asp.net?
thanks so much!!!
On Aug 11, 12:50 pm, Jules wrote:
Use Request("Arg") instead, this syntax gets the Arg from data post or
querystring.
Do not enclose args2, the server will get "args2" instead of the value
of args2.
data:{Arg:args2}
On Aug 11, 10:12 am, yi wrote:
> Hi Jules:
> thank you for your help!!
> if I use this:
>
> type: "POST",
> url:
Hi Jules:
thank you for your help!!
if I use this:
type: "POST",
url: "mywebpage.aspx,
data:{Arg:"args2"}
Do you know how can i get value of arg from sever side(code behind)? I
use asp.net, but i dont know how to fatch data when data put inside
{}, " data:{Arg:"args2"} "
Can i still use "Request
There is a limit on url length depending on the browser.
http://classicasp.aspfaq.com/forms/what-is-the-limit-on-querystring/get/url-parameters.html
use type:"POST" and data: instead and do not enclose the object
declaration
data:{Arg:args2} instead of data:"{Arg:args2}"
On Aug 11, 8:41 am, y
var MyData = {};
MyData[$a] = x;
data: MyData
And just to note, common practice shown in the jQuery library and
plugins is that variables starting with "$" are ones that are jQuery
objects. not that you *have* to do it, but it would make sense to
follow what others are doing
On Feb 20, 9
Another question about the data that is passed to $.ajax, is there a limit on
the string length that can be passed for the data?
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
>
> As far as i know, you wont be able to pass a form id to $.ajax method.
> Unless you want to pass it through one of the available paramete
As far as i know, you wont be able to pass a form id to $.ajax method.
Unless you want to pass it through one of the available parameters.
-GTG
On 8/12/07, Eridius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The reason for the question is that i am create a $.ajax_request class to
> provide additional fu
The reason for the question is that i am create a $.ajax_request class to
provide additional functionality to the current ajax request.
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
>
> If you are looking to submit a form using ajax, the you should take a look
> at the form plugin. http://www.malsup.com/jquery/form
If you are looking to submit a form using ajax, the you should take a look
at the form plugin. http://www.malsup.com/jquery/form/
This plugin offers 2 methods( among others) to submit a form using ajax.
They are ajaxSubmit() and ajaxForm().
More info can be obtained from the documentation.
-GTG
18 matches
Mail list logo
