[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-16 Thread weepy
I suspect that if the type is left off it assumes that it's javascript. nice templating engine On 15 July, 12:02, Brett Ritter wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote: > > Interesting view about this from Douglas Crockford: > ... > > language in all browsers has been Java

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-15 Thread Brett Ritter
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote: > Interesting view about this from Douglas Crockford: ... > language in all browsers has been JavaScript. In XHTML, this attribute is > required and unnecessary. In HTML, it is better to leave it out. The browser > knows what to do. That is i

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Mohd.Tareq
Hi Weepy, Very nice Weepy, really its making crazy ;) On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote: > Interesting view about this from Douglas Crockford: > > type="text/javascript" > This attribute is optional. Since Netscape 2, the default programming > language in all browsers has bee

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Karl Swedberg
Interesting view about this from Douglas Crockford: type="text/javascript" This attribute is optional. Since Netscape 2, the default programming language in all browsers has been JavaScript. In XHTML, this attribute is required and unnecessary. In HTML, it is better to leave it out. The bro

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Brett Ritter
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:37 PM, weepy wrote: > >> you don't define a type here making your page invalid > Are you referring to $().ready(function() { }) ?  You mean you'd I believe he's referring to the script tag itself. It should given a type (e.g. "text/javascript") -- Brett Ritter / Swift

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread weepy
            > >   To:         "jQuery (English)"                 >                                                   > >   Date:       07/14/2009 03:42 PM                                             >                                                   > >   Subj

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Michael Lawson
Date: 07/14/2009 03:42 PM Subject:[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire excellent, very ni

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread John Newman
Lawson > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:38 AM > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > Cc: jQuery (English) > Subject: [jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire > > wow you're right, i just couldn't stop :) > > Looks great! > > cheers > > Michael Lawson > Developme

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Rick Faircloth
very good, weepy! From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Lawson Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:38 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Cc: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire wow you're right, i just couldn't s

[jQuery] Re: <3 Solitaire

2009-07-14 Thread Michael Lawson
wow you're right, i just couldn't stop :) Looks great! cheers Michael Lawson Development Lead, Global Solutions, ibm.com Phone: 1-276-206-8393 E-mail: mjlaw...@us.ibm.com 'Whether one believes in a religion or not, and whether one believes in rebirth or not, there isn't anyone who doesn't app