[jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-19 Thread Henjo
Hi Mike, thanks for you reply. You are absolutely right. Tunnel vision and tiredness are a great combi ;-) Thanks! Henjo On Dec 16, 5:06 pm, Michael Geary m...@mg.to wrote: I'm glad you fixed your problem, but I'm certain that the conclusion (IE has trouble with a chained ajax call) is wrong.

[jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-16 Thread Henjo
For anyone looking for the solution I found, please read the thread: http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/2d570db96ed7f02a Henjo On Dec 15, 2:32 pm, Henjo henjohoek...@gmail.com wrote: Hi MorningZ, thanks for your thoughts. I didn't even think of that since it has

Re: [jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-16 Thread Michael Geary
I'm glad you fixed your problem, but I'm certain that the conclusion (IE has trouble with a chained ajax call) is wrong. In the code you posted in the other thread, the chained and non-chained versions are quite different. You didn't just cut the chain into parts: the non-chained version uses a

[jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-15 Thread Henjo
Hi MorningZ, thanks for your thoughts. I didn't even think of that since it has been a couple of weeks ago I built this. Only IE needed to be fixed. I finally was able to get it fixed by putting alerts in to see where it stopped. Apparently IE has trouble with a chained ajax call. I cut the chain

[jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-14 Thread Henjo
Hey Scott, thanks for posting. I will check this out and see if I can find something here... Henjo On Dec 14, 8:51 pm, Scott Stewart sstwebwo...@bellsouth.net wrote: There is a Firebug Lite which runs in IE, it's not nearly as good as Firebug, but it's better than nothing (or the developer

[jQuery] Re: Debugging in IE

2009-12-14 Thread MorningZ
I would *definitely* start by using the non-minified version of jQuery, as it's 1000x easier to get an idea of what's going on (i see in the source of the page you are using the min-ed version) On Dec 14, 4:31 pm, Henjo henjohoek...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Scott, thanks for posting. I will