On Monday, May 07, 2007 5:19 PM Daemach <> said:
> Those might be possible - let me give it some thought. Handling the
> regex is going to be tricky because it's a string and therefore needs
> to be escaped.
>
> On May 7, 4:40 pm, "Chris W. Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is slick!
>
You're probably right. I reversed it. I didn't know which was
accepted and I was too lazy to look for examples, so I figured "top-
down" was an ascending sort and went with it ;)
On May 7, 4:36 pm, "Josh Nathanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks real good...
>
> One question though, I thoug
Numerics are fixed.
On May 7, 5:27 pm, "Erik Beeson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorting is a little off. Filter CompanyName with che and sort by Amount:
> 21
> 414.2
> 41.65
> 317.85
>
> --Erik
You're right - I need to work on the numerics next. I am forced to do
an alphabetical sort if I want to sort on multiple columns
simultaneously, so that means converting numbers to strings while
retaining their order, and doing it quickly. I'll probably need to
limit the number of decimal places
Dagnabbit, I thought I fixed that last night :)
It works properly now.
On May 7, 5:28 pm, "Web Specialist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very good. Only one tip: if navigate to page 3 and filter by City Sao Paulo
> returns ZERO. Is necessary to jump to page 1 to show that records.
>
> Cheers
Very good. Only one tip: if navigate to page 3 and filter by City Sao Paulo
returns ZERO. Is necessary to jump to page 1 to show that records.
Cheers
2007/5/7, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yep - I'm looking forward to 1.1.3 very much ;)
On May 7, 4:54 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorting is a little off. Filter CompanyName with che and sort by Amount:
21
414.2
41.65
317.85
--Erik
On 5/7/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just uploaded my latest plugin, tableFilter(). It's an early beta
with ugly, less than optimal code, but it works pretty well. Feed it
a cle
Yep - I'm looking forward to 1.1.3 very much ;)
On May 7, 4:54 pm, "Brandon Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks great! BTW ... jQuery 1.1.3 will support col and colgroup tags.
>
> --
> Brandon Aaron
>
> On 5/7/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I just uploaded my latest plugin
Those might be possible - let me give it some thought. Handling the
regex is going to be tricky because it's a string and therefore needs
to be escaped.
On May 7, 4:40 pm, "Chris W. Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is slick!
>
> How about:
>
> * RegEx in the filter boxes? :)
> * Compari
Seems to work great in Safari! Multi-column sorting seems a little
wonk, but it seems a little wonk in FF too, so maybe it's an OS X
thing. Modifier keys don't work well in OS X.
--Erik
On 5/7/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just uploaded my latest plugin, tableFilter(). It's an ea
Daemach,
Nice demo! This plugin looks pretty sweet! :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Brandon Aaron wrote:
Looks great! BTW ... jQuery 1.1.3 will support col and colgroup tags.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/7/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just uploaded my latest plugin, tableFilter(). It's an early
Looks great! BTW ... jQuery 1.1.3 will support col and colgroup tags.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/7/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just uploaded my latest plugin, tableFilter(). It's an early beta
with ugly, less than optimal code, but it works pretty well. Feed it
a clean table and it
On Monday, May 07, 2007 4:02 PM Daemach <> said:
> I just uploaded my latest plugin, tableFilter(). It's an early beta
> with ugly, less than optimal code, but it works pretty well. Feed it
> a clean table and it will auto-filter, auto-sort and auto-page. You
> can sort and/or filter on multip
Wow - 3500 rows in a browser calls for some ajax or server-side
paging ;) The 800-row demo I did was over 400K with almost no
formatting!
On May 7, 5:21 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nice job, the demo is impressive!
>
> Yet that one table i'm working on is 3500 rows+
>
Looks real good...
One question though, I thought that up arrow means ascending and down arrow
means descending? It seems that the opposite is happening. Maybe it's a
US/non-US thing.
-- Josh
- Original Message -
From: "Daemach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jQuery (English)"
Sent:
Nice job, the demo is impressive!
Yet that one table i'm working on is 3500 rows+
I'll give your plugin a try, though !
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: mardi 8 mai 2007 0:02
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery]
16 matches
Mail list logo