Hi All can any one send me a demo of Jquery calendar
i wrote this code in html
$(document).ready(function(){
$(".menu a").hover(function() {
$(this).next("em").animate({opacity: "show", top: "-75"},
"slow");
}, function() {
$(this).next
Alexandre,
Another word of caution. Do choose your labels carefully. Avoid
keywords.
Adding quotes to keyword labels ensure compatibility with YUI
compressor.
var a = {
// new without quotes produce error in ie
"new": function() {
alert("new");
},
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:14 AM, R0bb13 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm using the autocomplete plugin to edit the name of a product in a
> CMS. When the name field (with autocomplete) is empty the autocomplete
> works perfectly. However when the field is not empty and you remove
> the content the suggestio
> > > > Why do I really need so much on ready?
> > > Yes! That's what we're all wondering! Don't keep us
> > > in suspense. :-)
> > When you work with a bunch of morons in a company
> > that uses them throughout the site and when the js are
> > packaged will lead to unnecessary performance loss.
Hi
I'm using the autocomplete plugin to edit the name of a product in a
CMS. When the name field (with autocomplete) is empty the autocomplete
works perfectly. However when the field is not empty and you remove
the content the suggestions don't appear but the ajax request retrieve
the correct dat
They create exactly the same result.
The object or array literal is likely to be a tiny bit faster than the new
Object/Array, because it avoids a name lookup (or several name lookups if
you're inside a nested function). But of course even if it is faster, it
would make a difference only if you're
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
>
>> There is nothing wrong with doing both -- nesting the inside the
>> and using the "for" attribute. Or is there?
I'm in the habit of doing so because I sometimes change my mind about
nesting inputs inside their labels. Because ...
> No
5000 is just an exaggeration, it's probably in the realm of 20
On Dec 30, 10:42 pm, Kean wrote:
> > >Why do I really need so much on ready?
> > Yes! That's what we're all wondering! Don't keep us in suspense. :-)
>
> When you work with a bunch of morons in a company that uses them
> throughout t
As for JS, saving bytes is totally a good thing.
On Dec 30, 10:53 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux"
wrote:
> why? It's just a shorthand, isn't it ? does it affect the computer
> resources in any manner ?
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Kean wrote:
>
> > Just a nitpick.
>
> > Don't do this
> > var
why? It's just a shorthand, isn't it ? does it affect the computer
resources in any manner ?
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Kean wrote:
>
> Just a nitpick.
>
> Don't do this
> var datascape = new Object();
> var datascape2 = new Array();
>
> Instead
> var datascape = {};
> var datascape2 = [];
> >Why do I really need so much on ready?
> Yes! That's what we're all wondering! Don't keep us in suspense. :-)
When you work with a bunch of morons in a company that uses them
throughout the site and when the js are packaged will lead to
unnecessary performance loss.
I have just started using superfish on our site http://christianmotorsports.comI am not a programmer so getting beyond the basic selection options and pasting in custom css code etc. is not clear to me. I have gone through and edited some existing css code for the general template on the site.Thi
_
From: Karl Swedberg
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 7:42 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Posting multiple values from a checkbox
On Dec 30, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Michael Geary wrote:
Your checkboxes all have the same ID attribute, and they have no NAME
attr
> From: Kean
>
> No, I don't take that as an insult.
I was worried needlessly, then. :-)
> I was just wondering how document ready was coded so it
> really was just a hypothetical question.
Well, there is the source code. :-)
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.2.6/jquery.js
Just
On Dec 31, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Michael Geary wrote:
They use in context like this: "You need to achieve Function
Closure." Not the way I would word it, but at least I can understand
what
they mean. :-)
That's pretty funny. Sounds like something you might find in a self-
help book. :-)
-
You got it, that's exactly what I was getting at, Ricardo. I assumed that
they actually meant "closures", but who knows, they could have even been
referring to something else.
Actually I've been getting a kick out of (or getting annoyed by, I'm not
sure which) the terminology that's come into use
Excellent analysis, Ricardo. BTW, which browser did you run your timing test
in?
Here's another tip. If you really do need to have thousands of ready
functions, you can speed things up a bit by rolling your own. For example:
window.ready = [];
jQuery(function() {
for( var fn, i =
Thanks all the same。 I've got it solved. Actually the problem is that .lt
and .gt were removed from the newly released jquery.
Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Kean wrote:
>
> Make a demo page or a html page.
>
> Some common mistakes
>
> 1. Did you include jQuery?
> 2. Did you write som
Hi Karl,
Thanks very much for your quick helps.
Feel very nice to hear from you. You write a very nice book. I can write
some simple codes after reading your books for only a week. I'm reading the
seventh chapter now.
Actually I'm going to release a website for our Chinese learning English
Vocab
Hi Samuel,
Sorry about the problems you're having with the code. The .lt()
and .gt() methods were removed from jQuery shortly after the book was
published. In their place, you can use the :lt() and :gt() selectors
or the .slice() method. The .slice() method is quite versatile, and
takes e
Make a demo page or a html page.
Some common mistakes
1. Did you include jQuery?
2. Did you write something like
var $table =$('table') before using $table.find() ?
On Dec 30, 7:30 pm, Samuel Wu wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I started writing jquery from last week with the help from a very good
Two issues at play here:
1. the HTML in most browsers doesn't reflect all recent changes done
via Javascript
2. the browser only saves form values after a submit
What you can do is save the values at the time of removal, and then re-
fill it when you put it back. Use the data() function:
// rem
Hi list, I need some help with autocomplete plugin.
I have two text field (name and surname) and I need to add to the name
field the autocomplete like this:
When the user start writing on it, it shows the coincidences and when
he select the correct item the surname field most be filled too. For
e
Hi, everyone
I started writing jquery from last week with the help from a very good
book Learning Jquery.
I met a problem when reading the book, which has the script:
$table.find('tbody tr').show()
.lt(2)
.hide()
.end()
.gt(5)
.end();
Where 2 and 5 are different from the book, but I think it
If I read the jQuery source code right, it seems that .html() does not
use this replaceHTML method even in 1.3b1
On Dec 30, 8:21 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> There is a long discussion about better 'innerHTML' methods, see here
> (check the comments also):
>
> http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/arch
Hi Ricardo,
Sweet, that's what I was expecting for an answer.
Hi Kean,
AFAIK, ready() puts the function you passed into an array of
functions. Another function is bound to the DOMContentLoaded event,
which is fired when the DOM is ready on compliant browsers. For the
others, several methods are in place to detect when DOM is loaded.
When the event fires/DOM
See, that is the kind of feedback I was interested in. I sell my self short
and thought I saw some inconsistencies and discrepancies; but, was unsure.
I appreciate everyones feedback.
Thank you,
Angel
I think Michael wanted to point out that they're called 'closures' and
not 'enclosures'. For a hiring questionnary that's not very bright.
Another one: there's no such thing as a "Javascript class". You can
have "class-like instantiation", but strictly we're speaking about
objects, constructors a
There is a long discussion about better 'innerHTML' methods, see here
(check the comments also):
http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/faster-than-innerhtml
http://ajaxian.com/archives/replacehtml-for-when-innerhtml-dogs-you-down
On Dec 30, 7:00 pm, Adam Guichard wrote:
> It ran in 5ms, but i
The children() in your loop is not counting the textnode either.
index() can't help you in this case, as it ignores nodes that are not
elements even using contents(). But you can use $.each to simplify
your code a bit:
var $items = $('Helloworld!!Goodnight moon!');
$.each($items.contents(), func
Oops I mean event.
On Dec 30, 8:11 pm, Kean wrote:
> Sounds like your nodes have to much element binded to them.
>
> On Dec 30, 1:00 pm, Adam Guichard wrote:
>
> > It ran in 5ms, but its my understanding if I use the method your
> > suggesting I'll be leaking memory. If I just set the innerhtm
Sounds like your nodes have to much element binded to them.
On Dec 30, 1:00 pm, Adam Guichard wrote:
> It ran in 5ms, but its my understanding if I use the method your
> suggesting I'll be leaking memory. If I just set the innerhtml = "",
> I think the dom element's children aren't disposed.
Rather than set the height, you could set min-height.
IE6 doesn't recognize min-height, but it treats height as min-height,
so you can set height within a conditional comment for IE6 only.
--Karl
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Dec 30, 2008, at 4
No, I don't take that as an insult.
I was just wondering how document ready was coded so it really was
just a hypothetical question.
Why do I really need so much on ready?
Also, MorningZ, I will be very active in the jQuery mailing list in
future to learn more js. Perhaps this is not the best s
On Dec 30, 2008, at 8:11 PM, Michael Geary wrote:
Your checkboxes all have the same ID attribute, and they have no NAME
attribute. Give each one a unique ID and NAME. You can use same
value for
those two attributes in a single checkbox, or they can be different.
But
each ID and each NAME s
"There probably is a better way to do it. "
Which is what i was getting at.. i hope "honest" isn't/wasn't
taken as "insulting"
On Dec 30, 10:16 pm, "Michael Geary" wrote:
> Come on, MorningZ, there's no need for insults.
>
> But yes, 5000 of those will be pretty slow - and that's before
http://www.learningjquery.com/2008/10/1-awesome-way-to-avoid-the-not-so-excellent-flash-of-amazing-unstyled-content
- Richard
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Kean wrote:
>
> I thought I saw an article covering this topic in learningjquery.com
> or somewhere else.
>
> Anyone care to show me whe
There's nothing wrong with running that for loop yourself. In fact, it will
be faster than any other solution - because all the other solutions will
just boil down to a loop with a bunch of extra code.
-Mike
> From: nachocab
>
> Allright, so I guess manually going through the contents()
> arra
Come on, MorningZ, there's no need for insults.
But yes, 5000 of those will be pretty slow - and that's before you even
execute the code inside those functions. How slow? It's easy to test. The
ready functions are run in the order that the $() functions are called. So
simply do this in a test pag
Allright, so I guess manually going through the contents() array is
the only solution.
The only function that comes close to giving me the index is
jQuery.inArray() (it's really just the for loop that I'm doing with a
different condition), but it doesn't let me specify the id or the
className, so
Viewstate is the probable enemy in your case as that "remembers"
the current state of the form and is does not reflect changes on the
client side
Time to ditch the postback model and use AJAX calls to handlers (ashx)
and such
On Dec 30, 6:50 pm, cantelopehead wrote:
> I have a drag and dr
Are your CSS directives declared in the header, or did you put them
within the body of the page (where they may be applied later than you
wish, or may not be at all). Are they in a CSS file that isn't being
loaded? (Use Firefox and Firebug to see is the CSS file is showing a
404 Not found error)
If you've got 5000 of those, it's *seriously* time to reconsider your
coding techniques. depending on that much JavaScript is just
plain old stupid..
On Dec 30, 8:59 pm, Kean wrote:
> Is document ready "actually" an event handler?
>
> Let's say I have
>
> $(function(){
>
> });
>
> $(f
I thought I saw an article covering this topic in learningjquery.com
or somewhere else.
Anyone care to show me where the article is?
Just a nitpick.
Don't do this
var datascape = new Object();
var datascape2 = new Array();
Instead
var datascape = {};
var datascape2 = [];
On Dec 30, 1:27 pm, "Alexandre Plennevaux"
wrote:
> wair, you're all scarrying me:
>
> i often do things like this:
>
> var datascape = new Object();
>
>
Is document ready "actually" an event handler?
Let's say I have
$(function(){
});
$(function(){
});
$(function(){
});
$(function(){
});
$(function(){
});
etc . around 5000 of those.
Will it actually degrade performance like 5000 bind()?
My guess is not much performance penalty, but ag
Yo!
Just found this mail group, if I'm in the wrong place just flame on ;)
To the business.
So I got a page with this structure:
Im just fetching a list of items with xml and inserting them as rows
in the table. And the reason I use ajax is that I want some smooth
paging t
Yo!
Just found this mail group, if I'm in the wrong place just flame on ;)
Hm.. tried to post but it never showed up... hope it doesn't end up in
"double post"
To the business.
So I got a page with this structure:
Im just fetching a list of items with xml and inserting the
I have a drag and drop sortable list that uses jQuery and the UI
finally works great. The problem I'm having is that the ASP button
I'm using POSTs back to the server the items in the original order.
How do I get the modified sequence back to the server? Just looking
for some general guidance or
Your checkboxes all have the same ID attribute, and they have no NAME
attribute. Give each one a unique ID and NAME. You can use same value for
those two attributes in a single checkbox, or they can be different. But
each ID and each NAME should be unique.
Also, quote all of your attribute values
Correct, the syntax is wrong. You want:
wrote:
>
> I've got checkboxes on my page. When I use the $.post method, it's
> only transmitting the first value out of my list. Here's my code:
>
> $.post("http://localhost/search_engine.php",{
>food_type: $("#food
I've got checkboxes on my page. When I use the $.post method, it's
only transmitting the first value out of my list. Here's my code:
$.post("http://localhost/search_engine.php",{
food_type: $("#food_type").val(),
food
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:20 AM, heohni
wrote:
>
>
> This: status.addClass(the_new_status);
> prints the new status, but the browser does not show the image which
> is connected with the new status class?
> Can I somehow refresh the div only? Is that possible?
>
Sorry for the delay; I've been a
> I have to remove() them first before inserting them elsewhere because
> otherwise the browser (Firefox in my case) complains about trying to
> insert an element that's already a part of the DOM.
Can you post a bit of code? It should be possible to select some
elements in jQuery and use an inser
> var $items = $('Helloworld...
jQuery will try to parse that with the browser's HTML parser, but it's
not HTML. I don't know if that will cause you sorrow or not.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/95718c9aab2c7483/af37adcb54b816c3
As for getting the index, maybe som
I've tested your code in IE6, IE7, FFox3, Opera 9.5 and Safari on Windows
and it works fine as expected.
Regards
Maurício
-Mensagem Original-
De: "Matt Wilson"
Para: "jQuery (English)"
Enviada em: terça-feira, 30 de dezembro de 2008 20:03
Assunto: [jQuery] $(document).ready fire
Hi all,
I have a submit button, and a function tied to it via $('form').submit
(function() { ... }); When the button is clicked, this function gets
executed, and the data gets sent to the server. However, I also call
this function via a context menu option (i.e., $('form').submit()).
Again, the
In the closure you have to set the arguments at the start too:
return function(parentDiv,image) {
...
}(parentDiv,image);
but I think it won't work this way because your closure won't be
executed right away (as it is inside an event handler) so it doesn't
make much sense to put it there.
Start
I've got some links that only serve as anchors for javascript, so I
use CSS to hide them like this:
.requiresjavascript
{
display:none;
}
and here's the HTML:
Clear all
Check all
The idea is that for a browser without javascript, those links don't
appear.
I want to show these links when
"According to Microsoft, closures are the cause of memory leaks. This
is of course deeply wrong, but it leads to Microsoft giving very bad
advice to programmers on how to cope with Microsoft's bugs."
http://javascript.crockford.com/memory/leak.html
This article seems to be a lot more reasonable,
wair, you're all scarrying me:
i often do things like this:
var datascape = new Object();
datascape.el = $('#datascape');
datascape.ini = function(){
datascape.el.click(function(){
dothis();
dothat();
});
}
is this pattern causing a potential memory leak pr
I believe jQuery does not count/iterate textnode. Maybe there's a
function in jQuery but I have no idea.
On Dec 30, 12:52 pm, nachocab wrote:
> Thank you both,
> The only problem is that the right answer isn't 2, it's 3. I'm
> actually looking for the index of item#my_item inside the contents
>
A good reason why closure is used
http://yuiblog.com/blog/2006/06/01/global-domination/
On Dec 30, 1:04 pm, Kean wrote:
> Klaus is right,
>
> Here's an article about closure causing
> leakshttp://www.javascriptkit.com/javatutors/closuresleak/index.shtml
>
> On Dec 30, 4:38 am, "Alexandre Ple
Klaus is right,
Here's an article about closure causing leaks
http://www.javascriptkit.com/javatutors/closuresleak/index.shtml
On Dec 30, 4:38 am, "Alexandre Plennevaux"
wrote:
> Klaus, you got me: frankly i have no "real" idea what is the purpose
> of enclosure.
> That's abstract art to me. i
It ran in 5ms, but its my understanding if I use the method your
suggesting I'll be leaking memory. If I just set the innerhtml = "",
I think the dom element's children aren't disposed. They just sit
around chewing up memory, so I don't think I can use the method your
suggesting.
On Dec 30, 2:4
Thank you both,
The only problem is that the right answer isn't 2, it's 3. I'm
actually looking for the index of item#my_item inside the contents
array. children() doesn't take into consideration the "!!" textnode.
On Dec 30, 9:43 pm, Ricardo Tomasi wrote:
> var $items = $('Helloworld id="my_ite
var $items = $('HelloworldGoodnight moon!');
var $my = $items.find('#my_item');
console.info( $items.children().index($my) );
or
var $items = $('HelloworldGoodnight moon!');
$items.children().each(function(i){
if ( this.id == 'my_item' ) console.info(i);
});
indexOf is a method of the String
just for laughs...see of
document.getElementById("ID of Div Tag").innerHTML = "";
is anything of an improvement
On Dec 30, 3:02 pm, Adam Guichard wrote:
> I'm using jTemplates to create a client grid, but I'm having trouble
> with load times. When I'm paging through the grid jTemplates is
Hi,
I've encountered, and worked around, a rendering performance problem
in WebKit based browsers.
I'm working on a webapp and a particular uncontrived page is rendered
by FireFox in about 0.5s while Safari takes about 12s -- that's about
20 times slower. And 12s is way too long from any
Hi,
[reposted, didn't appear in archives... sorry for the noise]
I've encountered, and worked around, a rendering performance problem
in WebKit based browsers.
I'm working on a webapp and a particular uncontrived page is rendered
by FireFox in about 0.5s while Safari takes about 12s -- that
I've had to write a big workaround to a problem I'm having. I've been
creating an application which involves me extracting DOM elements and
inserting them back elsewhere in the page.
I have to remove() them first before inserting them elsewhere because
otherwise the browser (Firefox in my case) c
I'm using jTemplates to create a client grid, but I'm having trouble
with load times. When I'm paging through the grid jTemplates is
taking 4+ seconds to clear the grid and 2+ seconds to load it. I've
got some work to do to make the loading time go down, but I'm worried
about the clearing time.
Nice plugin Mike...
On Dec 30, 1:49 pm, "Michael Geary" wrote:
> You can call setTimeout again and keep track of your loop counter, or you
> can use setInterval.
>
> To make that easy, I posted a slowEach() plugin to this group a while back.
> It may be just what you need. Here's the original po
$('#pageLeft').click(... looks for the element with that ID at the
time its run. If there's no match, it won't do anything. You need to
either add the event listeners after you change the element's ID, or
use event delegation. See the LiveQuery plug-in:
http://brandonaaron.net/docs/livequery/
-
Yeah I know, that was stupid, it would be rendered as text. Sleep is a
good thing.
On Dec 30, 2:57 am, Kean wrote:
> Richardo,
>
> LOL
$('Helloworld!!Goodnight moon!').find("#my_item").each
(function(){
alert(this.innerHTML);
});
Hmm I'd be interested to see how this can be done without using
each
On Dec 30, 12:07 pm, nachocab wrote:
> Actually that gives an error. It should be:
> var $items = $('Helloworld!! id="m
Actually that gives an error. It should be:
var $items = $('Helloworld!!Goodnight moon!');
for(var i=0; i <= $items.children().length; i++){
if ( $items.contents()[i].id == 'my_item' )
console.info(i)
}
It also needs to work with $items.contents()[i].className
On Dec 30, 8:30 pm, nach
You can call setTimeout again and keep track of your loop counter, or you
can use setInterval.
To make that easy, I posted a slowEach() plugin to this group a while back.
It may be just what you need. Here's the original post:
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=sloweach+jquery+plugin
Here
thank you sir
Am 30.12.2008 um 20:31 schrieb Kean:
Yes, just add the class jFlowPrev to your previous button
and class jFlowNext to your next button.
View the demo source to get the rest.
Yes, just add the class jFlowPrev to your previous button
and class jFlowNext to your next button.
View the demo source to get the rest.
On Dec 30, 11:02 am, "simonteu...@googlemail.com"
wrote:
> Hello Kean
>
> Is jFlow also offering the usage of arrows at the left and right
> sides?
>
> Nice t
Hi everyone,
I'd like to know if there's a way to do this without using a for loop.
You can just paste this in Firebug:
var $items = $('Helloworld!!Goodnight moon!');
for(var i=0; i <= $items.children().length; i++){
if ( $items.contents()[i].id == 'my_item' )
console.info(i)
}
Keep
Perhaps after 6 weeks it's time to move to a different solution?
(ditch the and use floating 's or the like)
the tablesorter plugin hasn't been working on in a long time by the
person who wrote it, the chances of you getting your answer of "why
did it break?" is super slim to none
On Dec 30,
Hello Kean
Is jFlow also offering the usage of arrows at the left and right
sides?
Nice that you answered so fast.
I also want to have a ajax live search. I already tried liveSearch by
andreaslagerkvist.com.
But it didnt work under windows ie7. Is there also an other option
with jquery.
You c
Pause on the server side then.
On Dec 30, 1:18 pm, bwdev wrote:
> Yes but the set TImeout seems to happen once. I need it to pause on
> each interation of the loop.
>
> On Dec 30, 1:05 pm, "Michael Geary" wrote:
>
> > Not only will that lock up the current browser, in many browsers it wil
Why would my script break when I wrap a table around it?
ripcurlksm wrote:
>
> still looking for a solution...
>
>
>
> ripcurlksm wrote:
>>
>> I have a working version of the jQuery TableSorter but when I wrap the
>> div in a table, the pagination stops working. This appears to be a CSS
>>
hi josh
thanks for all your work
its looking good.
a) any chance of getting this to work with the meta data plugin ?
b) any idea when the above (blank input) could be addressed - just
wondering as i need to make a call on wether i use it on a current
project.
many thanks!
sean
hi josh
thanks for all your work
its looking good.
a) any chance of getting this to work with the meta data plugin ?
b) any idea when the above (blank input) could be addressed - just
wondering as i need to make a call on wether i use it on a current
project.
many thanks!
sean
Perfect! Thank you very much!
:)
-jj.
On 30 déc, 17:20, Joe wrote:
> Hey JJ,
>
> After the delete.php?id="X" is loaded and completed, do you then want
> the display.php to be loaded? If so, place it in a callback function
> so it will be completed after delete.php has completed/sent a
> respo
Yes but the set TImeout seems to happen once. I need it to pause on
each interation of the loop.
On Dec 30, 1:05 pm, "Michael Geary" wrote:
> Not only will that lock up the current browser, in many browsers it will
> lock up *every* browser window or tab. Plus, if someone is running on
> batter
I'm having a problem with Jquery's tab plugin.
Specifically, I've got a page with a couple of tabs. On that page, in
one of the tabs, is a link to another tab. However, the link doesn't
work. Additionally, I've noticed that on my main navigation, if I'm on
the page with multiple tabs, and I click
Not only will that lock up the current browser, in many browsers it will
lock up *every* browser window or tab. Plus, if someone is running on
battery power it will drain the battery needlessly.
As Richard said, setTimeout is the right solution:
doSomething();
setTimeout( function() {
sample
http://www.aemundo.com.br/jquer/validate/demo.html
Maybe try jFlow?
http://www.gimiti.com/kltan/wordpress/?p=46
On Dec 30, 6:51 am, "simonteu...@googlemail.com"
wrote:
> Hello jQuery Community
>
> I have a question about the Coda Slider.
>
> How can I create more than one Slider on one Webpage?
>
> The first works. But the second is just "loadin
If you don't want to lock the browser, use setTimeout
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/DOM/Window.setTimeout
- Richard
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Joe wrote:
>
> // Similar to PHP's sleep function.
> function pause(numOfSeconds) {
>
>numOfSeconds *= 1000;
>var startTime = new Dat
// Similar to PHP's sleep function.
function pause(numOfSeconds) {
numOfSeconds *= 1000;
var startTime = new Date().getTime();
while (new Date().getTime() < startTime + numOfSeconds);
return false;
}
// Let's pause for 5 seconds...
pause(5);
console.log('Awake Now');
A simple wa
> I am using the cycle plugin to swap entire pages for my navigation. On one
> page, I have a unordered list that is supposed to be "display:none" by
> default. Then when a link on the page is click, it shows slowly. However,
> for some reason the cycle plugin seems to be showing it by default
Hello jQuery Community
I have a question about the Coda Slider.
How can I create more than one Slider on one Webpage?
The first works. But the second is just "loading".
Does someone have an idea.
I would thank you for an answer.
Simon
I have the following code and want to basically write something out,
let it sit for a while, and then write something else out...how do I
do the pause/wait?
Thanks!
myURL="getSearchResults.php";
$.getJSON(myURL, function(data) {
for
Hi. I'm using CGIDEV2 with AJAX, JQuery, and JSON to page through
search results (showing 100 at a time). For the paging, I have a
beginning arrow, page left arrow, page right arrow, and an end arrow.
When I am on the first page of results, the beginning and page left
arrows have an id of "begin
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
