Thanks all for the great suggestions! I think I'm going to use
George's solution for now (it's easy, if slightly verbose), but when I
have a free moment I'm going to follow mkmanning's advice and look in
to making a custom selector.
Jeremy
On Apr 26, 12:03 pm, George Adamson
so the name=someName has to be repeated for each value.
How about $([name=someName]).filter([value=someValue],
[value=otherValue]) ?
Cheers,
George
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=extend+jquery+expressions
As an alternative, you can use the normal multi-selector syntax (comma
separated):
$([name=someName][value=someValue],[name=otherName]
[value=otherValue]);
On Apr 24, 10:07 pm, barton bartonphill...@gmail.com wrote:
That is very interesting, can
The difference of the multi-selector syntax vs. the extended selector
should be pointed out, in case it's not immediately apparent. From the
OP's original request:
$(*[name='someName'][value='someValue'||'someOtherValue']);
in multi-selector syntax this would actually be:
You can always create your own selector:
jQuery.extend(jQuery.expr[':'], {
'values': function(a,i,m) {
return a.value $.inArray(a.value,m[3].split(','))!=-1;
}
});
Use like:
$('input[name=fooA]:values(foo1,foo4)');
On this markup it returns the first and last inputs:
That is very interesting, can you explain it a bit. I can't find any
documentation on jQuery.expr[:] -- I can find it in the code but
don't really understand what/how it does/works. jQuery.expr[:] =
jQuery.expr.filters; but now I'm really lost.
On Apr 24, 6:13 pm, mkmanning michaell...@gmail.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
