I'll give our "stuff" another go tomorrow...
On Monday 27 February 2006 01:23 pm, Charles O Nutter wrote:
> Fixed! The wrapper for includes, IncludedModuleWrapper, was never
> updated when I fixed the module include ordering, so it was still
> expecting superclasses to be included below it rather
Fixed! The wrapper for includes, IncludedModuleWrapper, was never
updated when I fixed the module include ordering, so it was still
expecting superclasses to be included below it rather than above it. I
updated it to do things the correct way and it works right now. I also
added a test case based o
