I agree we should get it working with 1.4 and higher, but for a "technology preview" release that really doesn't officially support Rails, we can probably say 5.0 only right now.
On 6/26/06, David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 26 June 2006 08:37, Thomas E Enebo wrote:> I have been u
On Monday 26 June 2006 08:37, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> I have been using Java5 mostly. I sometimes pop back and run with
> Java 1.4.2 to make sure things still work but I haven't done that with
> a rails app). I guess this could explain things pretty well.
>
> Unless we can find quick resoluti
y find anything in 5 that would cause this problem. Ihaven't found any indications that regexen are treated differently either.Strange.I'm not sure how to proceed from here, actually.
/O- Original Message -From: Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:
t;
Date: Monday, June 26, 2006 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Disrepency with lineendings.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> I run 1.4.2 on Windows. I only rarely try 5 on Windows.
>
> I use 5 on Linux because it's supported and easily-installed in
&
I run 1.4.2 on Windows. I only rarely try 5 on Windows.I use 5 on Linux because it's supported and easily-installed in Ubuntu.I would be interested in knowing what "just broke" of course. Interesting find!
On 6/26/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hiya.I've found something quite nasty while t
AIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, June 26, 2006 2:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] Disrepency with lineendings.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> I have been using Java5 mostly. I sometimes pop back and run
> with
> Java 1.4.2 to make sure things still work but
I have been using Java5 mostly. I sometimes pop back and run with
Java 1.4.2 to make sure things still work but I haven't done that with
a rails app). I guess this could explain things pretty well.
Unless we can find quick resolution, we may just say do not run
rails on webrick with anythin
Hiya.
I've found something quite nasty while thinking about why line endings
behave so differently on different win32 boxes. Then it hit me: I'm
using 1.4.2 for most things, but I know that some of you are using newer
JVM's.
Then I found this:
"For those folks looking to switch to Java 1.5/Tige
