JRun behavior is VERY different than ServletExec ones

1999-05-08 Thread Roberto Torresani
JRun 2.3.1 (just upgraded) RedHat Linux 5.2 with kernel 2.2.6 Apache 1.3.3 JDK1.2 JRun has a couple of feature (bugs?, spec 0.92 misundertanding?) that there aren't in Sun's ServletExec: 1) ServletExec parse the JSP page and generate the servlet in sequence, e.g., if you have some Java

JSP tools

1999-05-08 Thread Roberto Torresani
Could you give me, please, a list of JSP modules for Apache? What about GNUJSP? When will it adhere to 0.92 spec? -- Roberto Torresani --- Informatica e Statistica Applicate Istituto Agrario di S.Michele all'Adige Via E.Mach, 1 38010 S.Michele a/Adige - TN

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Richard Dallaway
I've enjoyed reading the thread on Pagelets, but I'm not convinced the whole of the Pagelet proposal is needed. But I could well be missing something here (all clues appreciated!) From what I can gather, all you require is for a bean to have a destroy() method called, if it has one. I.e., if

Re: JSP tools

1999-05-08 Thread Roberto Torresani
And when will it be released? Vincent Partington wrote: Hi Roberto, Roberto Torresani wrote: What about GNUJSP? When will it adhere to 0.92 spec? GNUJSP will never adhere to the JSP 0.92 spec. However I am currently reading the draft of the 1.0 spec and plan to implement that as soon

web hosts?

1999-05-08 Thread Ferenc Csizmadia
Hi, Does anyone know about web hosting companies that support JSP? Thanks in advance, Ferenc Csizmadia === To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For

Test

1999-05-08 Thread Anonymous
Test (with apologies) - I did not get a confirmation from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for subscription === To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JSP-INTEREST". For general

Re: A Compatibility Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Magnus Stenman
why not say: A portable Tag Extension Mechanism will be available in JSP 1.1. The following extension tags must be implemented in 1.1 compliant servers jsp:loop jsp:includeif jsp:excludeif. Implementing these tags (albeit non-portably) is optional for JSP 1.0 servers. Orion does

Re: A Compatibility Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Magnus Stenman
We made the decision to retain the 0.92 tags in our current 1.0 implementation for the reason that this is an 1.0 preliminary release, not the final release, and as strong members of the "anti scriptlet when not needed" camp we would very much like to see the loop etc tags included in the 1.0

Re: A Compatibility Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Foster Bob
Whether to retain the tags is your decision, but moving them to the jsp namespace is questionable. Unless you have advance knowledge these tags will appear in a future version of JSP, you should put them in your own namespace and allow developers to include a taglib directive specifying your

Re: Another configuration question...

1999-05-08 Thread Drew Cox
Hi Michael, I couldn't see a reply on the list to your question, so I thought I would give it a shot Do you realise that the Sun 1.0 reference implementation is a complete web sever, servlet runner and JSP engine ? Many people seem to think it's something you need to plug into an existing

Re: JSP SQL Stores Procedures

1999-05-08 Thread Drew Cox
Hi Brian, I can give a general opinion on the use of database stored procedures, unfortunately from traditional client-server experience, rather than JSP, although I think some similar issues apply. We investigated the use of stored procedures for any of the core database transactions that we

Re: Pagelets Proposal

1999-05-08 Thread Drew Cox
Hi Chris, The base bean is really a bean, because it has properties related to its underlying database entity. I understand your architecture, although I guess it comes down to what we mean when we say "bean"And I think we would have to defer to Sun for the official definition of