Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-30 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:21:33AM -0800, Martin Davis wrote: > Not sure I follow. The files have been updated to indicate the licenses. > What do you think they should say? What they say now is ok, about copyright ownership: * Copyright (C) 2016 Vivid Solutions About applied license there's

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Hey Sandro - I am checking against the uDig project - here is an example CswCatalog.java that is similar to the one you provided. My

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-29 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:03:33PM +, Jody Garnett wrote: > The dual license amounts to BSD so we can work with everyone, and EPL if > you are concerned about patents. > > When using the code you can choose which of the two licenses your > organization finds appropriate. The comment on top

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-29 Thread Martin Davis
The two BSD licenses are the same BSD3 license - they are just there because there are two copyrights on different files. I don't think this affects any licensing questions. The issue of AND vs OR does seem like it needs clarification, at least on this list. Is it possible that in legalese AND

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-29 Thread Martin Davis
@Felix: only forthcoming releases. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Felix Obermaier wrote: > Hello, > > does this license change apply to the forthcoming JTS releases or does it > apply to all released versions of JTS as well? > > Felix Obermaier > > > >

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-29 Thread Martin Davis
Not sure I follow. The files have been updated to indicate the licenses. What do you think they should say? On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:49:51AM -0800, Martin Davis wrote: > > The two BSD licenses are the same BSD3

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-29 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:49:51AM -0800, Martin Davis wrote: > The two BSD licenses are the same BSD3 license - they are just there > because there are two copyrights on different files. I don't think this > affects any licensing questions. I think copyright ownership (and applied license)

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-28 Thread Jody Garnett
BSD is compatible (can be used by) anything. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:19 AM Erwan Bocher wrote: > Dear Martin, > > Is this license compatible with GPL 3 ? > > Best regards > > > > -- > Erwan Bocher > - > Ingénieur de

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-28 Thread Jody Garnett
The dual license amounts to BSD so we can work with everyone, and EPL if you are concerned about patents. When using the code you can choose which of the two licenses your organization finds appropriate. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:58 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > BSD is

Re: [Jts-topo-suite-user] A major step along the road to LocationTech

2016-01-28 Thread Andrea Ross
Dear Everyone, On behalf of LocationTech & it's parent the Eclipse Foundation, just confirming what Jody has written. The re-licensing & move to git is a really great thing. Thanks again to Martin, Jody, Jim, Rob, and others who made it happen over the last few days. Also, I am especially