RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
I would add to your list. Is it well documented? Is it easy to configure? Does it have community support? (more people that use it, more bugs get found and fixed) Can you get other support? Can you find info on it and best practices with it (with books, articles, etc.)? Can you hire someone off

[jug-discussion] erik's new book on slashdot!

2002-11-14 Thread Warner Onstine
Just thought I'd share this - former JUG Alum Erik Hatcher's Ant book is reviewed on slashdot: http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/14/ 0326206mode=threadtid=108 -warner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 07:29 PM 11/13/2002 -0800, you wrote: See more below: --- Warner Onstine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 06:14 PM, Lesiecki Nicholas wrote: Warner says: I'd prefer not to [cover EJB/CMP] for a few reasons: 1) While I know that it is a kind of O/R it is

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Tim Colson
His scope was TOO BIG from the beginning and certainly doesn't need widening! +1 (That's why I want to get my favorites near the top. grin) I advocate that we stick with the original idea (maybe even cut it down to 3 or 4) and save the EJB stuff for sometime later (maybe the following

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 08:41 PM 11/13/2002 -0700, Warner wrote: Uncle! ;-) Ok, so the lineup will be (contingent on getting some help on unknown frameworks + a consensus): Castor (castor.exolab.org) Hibernate (http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/) Torque (jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque) OJB

[jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Warner Onstine
Ok, Before we get too deep here, I would like to know if we have enough +1's for O/R tools for the meeting: Tim +1 Warner +1 Nick +1 (even if no EJB?) Andy +1 Tom Hicks +1 I'll throw in Drew's +1, because he asked me about Torque a while ago, but I don't know if he'll be able to make it and I

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Vincent Greene
+1 for O/R tools. I don't think EJB counts as an O/R tool, and the EJB vs. O/R tools discussion would make a fine topic all by its self. I would especially like to see a knowledgable proponent for each duke it out. Maybe we could find an impartial (hah!) moderator. Warner Onstine wrote: Ok,

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Jon Thomas
I would add to your list. Is it well documented? Is it easy to configure? Does it have community support? (more people that use it, more bugs get found and fixed) Can you get other support? Can you find info on it and best practices with it (with books, articles, etc.)? Can you hire someone off

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Ritchie
A presentation on O/R Tools sounds great. I have quite an interest in the subject since we wrote one at AMO. I don't have anything lined up for the December presentation, so this sounds fantastic. We still need a good supply of 15 min presenters though, so don't hesitate to volunteer if you

RE: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Jon Thomas
I stayed at the Vegas Hilton but I heard Luxor had a great breakfast buffet -Original Message- From: Tim Colson [mailto:tcolson;cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap Simon - We still need a

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Ritchie
Tim, That's great. You're on the list then. So far, then, for the December presentation we have: Short presentation- Tim speaking on Thinlets Long presentation- Warner speaking on O/R Tools If we get more suggestions we'll have a vote. Simon. Tim Colson wrote: Simon - We still need a

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Eddie Dimond
+1 for the O/R tools comparison. I agree that adding EJB would be too much in one presentation. Eddie --- Warner Onstine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, Before we get too deep here, I would like to know if we have enough +1's for O/R tools for the meeting: Tim +1 Warner +1 Nick +1 (even

Re: [jug-discussion] Sun will trademark anything

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Ritchie
Warner Onstine wrote: A, someone from Sun on the list (hides head in shame ;-). Actually, not just someone from Sun. Rob is the Chairman of the JCP (sm). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Rene Stone
I'd also just like to see the O/R tools for the presentation sans EJB. Rene Warner Onstine wrote: Ok, Before we get too deep here, I would like to know if we have enough +1's for O/R tools for the meeting: Tim +1 Warner +1 Nick +1 (even if no EJB?) Andy +1 Tom Hicks +1 I'll throw in Drew's

[jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Warner Onstine
Ok, Since the general consensus is that EJB requires it's own presentation - (BTW who did the last one and can we put a link on the site directing people to it?) I'm going to propose the following: Let's keep the current presentation to 4 tools (max), please vote for your favorite. Castor

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Warner Onstine
My votes ;-) On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 02:03 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: Ok, Since the general consensus is that EJB requires it's own presentation - (BTW who did the last one and can we put a link on the site directing people to it?) I'm going to propose the following: Let's keep the

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 04:59 PM 11/13/2002 -0700, Warner wrote: If this is selected as the next topic. I would like some specific questions asked now, so I can prepare the answers for the presentation. 1. What entity relationships does the ORMapping support? 11. one-to-one 22. one-to-may

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 02:03 PM 11/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: Let's keep the current presentation to 4 tools (max), please vote for your favorite. Castor (castor.exolab.org) +1 Hibernate (http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/) +1 Torque (jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque) +1 OJB (jakarta.apache.org/ojb) +1

RE: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Mike Oliver
s/+1/+2/g Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -Original Message- From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:hickst;tohono.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] dec.

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Vincent Greene
Sick! Shouldn't that be s/\+1/\+2/g anyway? Mike Oliver wrote: s/+1/+2/g Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -Original Message- From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:hickst;tohono.com] Sent: Thursday, November

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Thomas Hicks
At 02:44 PM 11/14/2002 -0700, you wrote: Sick! Shouldn't that be s/\+1/\+2/g anyway? Not in VI, but maybe he was doing SED? -tom - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
answers for EJB CMP CMR At 04:59 PM 11/13/2002 -0700, Warner wrote: If this is selected as the next topic. I would like some specific questions asked now, so I can prepare the answers for the presentation. 1. What entity relationships does the ORMapping support? 11. one-to-one yes

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Jon Thomas
True but even then weblogic had a much better community and documentation base. 6 of one... -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:rhightower;learningpatterns.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] [dec

RE: [jug-discussion] [dec presentation] survey of O/R tools

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
i agree. resin's is good. the question was not better, but good. all True but even then weblogic had a much better community and documentation base. 6 of one... -Original Message- From: Richard Hightower [mailto:rhightower;learningpatterns.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002

Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation recap

2002-11-14 Thread Richard Hightower
it has OR support +1 for O/R tools. I don't think EJB counts as an O/R tool, and the EJB vs. O/R tools discussion would make a fine topic all by its self. I would especially like to see a knowledgable proponent for each duke it out. Maybe we could find an impartial (hah!) moderator.

RE: [jug-discussion] list policy

2002-11-14 Thread Tim Colson
Heat is difficult. It would take a lot to get our systems manager to raise the temperature of that room. And he would demand payment in Guinness. :) I'd gladly pay in Guinness. grin Seriously though, aren't there any conference rooms that aren't sub-arctic that could be used? :-) Or

RE: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Tim Colson
Castor (castor.exolab.org) +0 Hibernate (http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/) +1 Torque (jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque) +1 OJB (jakarta.apache.org/ojb) -1 TJDO (http://tjdo.sourceforge.net/) -1 My preference would be to drop TJDO and then present that later on it's own. +1 OJB seems