Re: [jug-discussion] FYI: dom4j

2002-12-11 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Hey Tom, since you linked to my articles I may as well toss in my $.02. I've tried a number of different projects using any one or more of these three APIs. I'd put the tradeoffs this way: * DOM - the big advantages are cross-language interface (if you use other languages beside Java)

Re: [jug-discussion] FYI: dom4j

2002-12-11 Thread Erik Hatcher
Small world, Dennis! For everyone elses information, Dennis was a speaker at the symposiums where Rick and I also spoke. I attended a couple of his presentations and was incredibly impressed with the ease at which Dennis can discuss all things XML and web services related. Erik Dennis

Re: [jug-discussion] FYI: dom4j

2002-12-11 Thread Warner Onstine
First, thanks for listening Dennis! On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 09:56 AM, Thomas Hicks wrote: (BTW, I don't have search bots constantly scanning mailing lists for reference to my articles so I can jump in on the discussion. :-) I've been on the Tucson list for a while since I get

Re: [jug-discussion] FYI: dom4j

2002-12-11 Thread Randolph S Kahle
Just want to toss in my .02 here. As someone else pointed when they discovered a Sun person was listening they were a little taken aback by that. We shouldn't be. We are a community. We should feel free to state what we want. Just because someone is listening doesn't mean we have to