Re: [jug-discussion] ANT question

2004-01-08 Thread Mike Oliver
And no diagrams or powerpoints, Erik wants to see code...;-) Ollie Erik Hatcher wrote: On Jan 7, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: Not necessarily. You can write maven plugins using jelly only (and you can use Ant inside of a jelly script as well with little or no changes to the

Re: [jug-discussion] Consulting groups in Tucson?

2003-12-24 Thread Mike Oliver
Of course Science Applications International Corporation, aka SAIC has offices here and they are BIG worldwide, Thomas Hicks works there and he might be able to tell you how many people work there, but then he would have to kill you. Ollie Tim Colson wrote: What are some of the IT consulting

Re: [jug-discussion] Consulting groups in Tucson?

2003-12-24 Thread Mike Oliver
his email, would you mind forwarding my email to him (or, send his email to me)? I really didn't want to clutter up the discussion group list serve with my request. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many thanks! Bruce Clayton -Original Message- From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

Re: [jug-discussion] Consulting groups in Tucson?

2003-12-23 Thread Mike Oliver
Oh yes, http://www.matrix-media.com My company...;-) Ollie Warner Onstine wrote: On Tuesday, December 23, 2003, at 02:28 PM, Tim Colson wrote: Before anybody gets excited, I'm just curious - not looking to hire. What are some of the IT consulting companies in Tucson that do custom

Re: [jug-discussion] Pet Peave

2003-11-10 Thread Mike Oliver
find it let me know. It may have even been internal (I was employed by IBM at the time). Mike Oliver wrote: So how many of you have found a reference to a class, and can't find out which *^%$ jar it is located in? What do you do when you have this problem? Ollie

Re: [jug-discussion] frameworks

2003-11-09 Thread Mike Oliver
Thomas Hicks wrote: At 02:55 PM 11/8/2003, Eirk wrote: On Saturday, November 8, 2003, at 02:07 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: Hi all, After reading this post by Howard Ship: http://javatapestry.blogspot.com/ 2003_11_02_javatapestry_archive.html#106823763090126075 I realize that this would help me

[jug-discussion] Pet Peave

2003-11-09 Thread Mike Oliver
So how many of you have found a reference to a class, and can't find out which *^%$ jar it is located in? What do you do when you have this problem? Ollie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [jug-discussion] Pet Peave

2003-11-09 Thread Mike Oliver
. -warner On Sunday, November 9, 2003, at 08:55 AM, Mike Oliver wrote: So how many of you have found a reference to a class, and can't find out which *^%$ jar it is located in? What do you do when you have this problem? Ollie

[jug-discussion] Re: [JXTA discuss] P2PJ November

2003-11-09 Thread Mike Oliver
-in-chief -Original Message- From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JXTA discuss] P2PJ November Raymond Gao wrote: November issue of P2PJ is available online. This issue has an article about P2P

[jug-discussion] Test

2003-01-18 Thread Mike Oliver
I was talking to Ray Ramos this morning about the new Axis4Struts project I am heading up on SourceForge and he hadnt seen the posting on jug discussion so I am testing to see if it is working. Michael Oliver Chief Technology Officer AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ

[jug-discussion] RE: Axis/SOAP proposal for Struts

2003-01-17 Thread Mike Oliver
about this potentially being a part of a future struts package. With our current plugins for Struts (we have a model framework called eQ!), it really expands our possibilities as well, and the sales/marketing guy will love that :-) Robert Mike Oliver wrote: Robert, My thinking exactly! I just

[jug-discussion] RE: Axis/SOAP proposal for Struts

2003-01-17 Thread Mike Oliver
, 2003 1:46 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Axis/SOAP proposal for Struts On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Mike Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:45:49 -0700 From: Mike Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Axis

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Mike Oliver
Warner, You will be pleasantly surprised with VB.NET so don't be too negative or you may eat your words. Albeit as a Java dude, you will like the sharps better. Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -Original

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Mike Oliver
: Re: [jug-discussion] portable.net released On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 07:55 AM, Mike Oliver wrote: Warner, You will be pleasantly surprised with VB.NET so don't be too negative or you may eat your words. Albeit as a Java dude, you will like the sharps better. If they've made a decent

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Mike Oliver
, Mike Oliver wrote: Warner, You will be pleasantly surprised with VB.NET so don't be too negative or you may eat your words. Albeit as a Java dude, you will like the sharps better. If they've made a decent language then I will gladly eat my words, last time I looked was VB5 and I wasn't

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Mike Oliver
. This takes some getting used to. Art -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11/24/02 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] portable.net released On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 07:55 AM, Mike Oliver wrote: Warner, You will be pleasantly surprised

RE: [jug-discussion] Questioning XP

2002-11-22 Thread Mike Oliver
Good post Warner, if people remember I had a dialog with the folks at Object Mentor and Ron Jeffries in particular about a year ago when the XP Installed book came out. It was my contention that XP could benefit by collaborative tools that would allow things like Pair Programming and close

RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far.

2002-11-19 Thread Mike Oliver
Sorry Warner the article didn't give the email or webcam address for either the guy in NY or the guy in Austin. Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far.

2002-11-19 Thread Mike Oliver
] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far. How'd I get dragged into this? -warner On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 03:04 PM, Mike Oliver wrote: Sorry Warner the article didn't give the email or webcam address for either the guy in NY or the guy

RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far.

2002-11-19 Thread Mike Oliver
PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far. the troublemaker. Lest I be accused of never discussing java here let me say that I installed the eclipse beta today and like it already. -Original Message- From: Mike Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation

2002-11-14 Thread Mike Oliver
s/+1/+2/g Michael Oliver AppsAsPeers LLC 7391 S. Bullrider Ave. Tucson, AZ 85747 Phone:(520)574-1150 Fax:(520)844-1036 -Original Message- From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:hickst;tohono.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] dec.

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows

2002-11-01 Thread Mike Oliver
+2 for SWT At 03:59 PM 11/1/2002 -0700, you wrote: +1 for SWT -Original Message- From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie;amo.com] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows Warner Onstine wrote: Aren't

Re: [jug-discussion] Layoffs at NewMonics

2002-08-15 Thread Mike Oliver
Art, You can pass them my contact info (below). We are not hiring at the moment but on the verge and it wouldn't hurt to get acquainted. We have a number of sweat equity contributors now, and not looking to have any more, but things change...as you know. Ollie At 03:20 PM 8/15/2002 -0700,

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Mike Oliver
] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues! Hmmm...I find it hard to be convinced by arguments like this: it's not as extensible and it costs money...but it rocks! -tom At 11:13 AM 7/18/2002 -0700, Erik wrote: Nope. But it rocks! Mike Oliver wrote: Is IntelliJ