Sorry for the delayed responsemy ISP's spam filter suddenly
decided that JUG
discussions were spam (whereas, previously, they were
not).sometimes I hate computers.
At 09:57 AM 7/14/2008, you wrote:
Yeah, we have a huge case of NIH syndrome. This isn't the half of
it, trust me. :) OTOH
At 03:15 PM 7/10/2008, Nick wrote:
This is pretty cool:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/protocol-buffers-googles-data.html
Protocol buffers are *the* lingua franca for RPCs, structured data
storage, and just about any data sharing you can think of at Google.
If you're building a d
Yeah, we have a huge case of NIH syndrome. This isn't the half of it,
trust me. :) OTOH, some of the systems we've built ourselves have been
blockbuster hits that enable much of what you know as "Google" today.
In response to your comment about backward compatibility, Protocol
Buffers are a
At 03:15 PM 7/10/2008, Nick wrote:
This is pretty cool:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/protocol-buffers-googles-data.html
Protocol buffers are *the* lingua franca for RPCs, structured data
storage, and just about any data sharing you can think of at Google.
If you're building a d
old skewl serial processing.
On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:34 AM, nlesiecki wrote:
Stop bits?
On Jul 11, 2008, at 1:08 AM, William H. Mitchell wrote:
At 09:53 PM 7/10/2008, Chad wrote:
These kids and their new-fangled protocols. XML was good enough for
my grandfather, and it's good enough for me!
Stop bits?
On Jul 11, 2008, at 1:08 AM, William H. Mitchell wrote:
At 09:53 PM 7/10/2008, Chad wrote:
These kids and their new-fangled protocols. XML was good enough for
my grandfather, and it's good enough for me! Why, we had to make our
angle brackets out of two sticks and baling wire...
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:08 AM, William H. Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I took a look at that link but the documentation seems incomplete -- I
> didn't see anything about specifying the number of stop bits.
What was it Brian said about Java being the new Assembly?
--
At 09:53 PM 7/10/2008, Chad wrote:
These kids and their new-fangled protocols. XML was good enough for
my grandfather, and it's good enough for me! Why, we had to make our
angle brackets out of two sticks and baling wire...
I took a look at that link but the documentation seems incomplete --
These kids and their new-fangled protocols. XML was good enough for
my grandfather, and it's good enough for me! Why, we had to make our
angle brackets out of two sticks and baling wire...
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Warner Onstine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very cool Nick, thanks for sha
Very cool Nick, thanks for sharing!
-warner
On Jul 10, 2008, at 3:15 PM, nlesiecki wrote:
This is pretty cool:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/protocol-buffers-
googles-data.html
Protocol buffers are *the* lingua franca for RPCs, structured data
storage, and just about any
This is pretty cool:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/protocol-buffers-googles-data.html
Protocol buffers are *the* lingua franca for RPCs, structured data
storage, and just about any data sharing you can think of at Google.
If you're building a distributed system and want to pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
