Re: [jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-22 Thread Lesiecki Nicholas
OGNL Nick --- Tim Colson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So just assume for a moment that RAM is cheap and you decided to load > 100K > objects into memory. Assume those objects were "Employees"... you can > imagine the fields would be the usual suspects. Assume each employee is > associated with a

[jug-discussion] Searching large object graphs

2004-12-22 Thread Tim Colson
So just assume for a moment that RAM is cheap and you decided to load 100K objects into memory. Assume those objects were "Employees"... you can imagine the fields would be the usual suspects. Assume each employee is associated with a profile that is another object, which is composed of a bunch of