On Dec 26, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Art Gramlich wrote:
Where's Hatcher to plug ant? :-)
These days I mostly am dealing with Rake, but thus far at a Ruby
newbie user level. I will be getting fancier with Rake very shortly
though.
Where do I stand with Maven? Never even really used it other than to
build early Maven1 stuff, and didn't like it then. I hear its gotten
a lot better, and I'd certainly recommend new projects that have
straightforward needs give it a try.
As for an older project now not building - that's scary. Setting up
a local repo with locked in stable and tested dependencies is a must
for any decent sized project.
I also hear good things about Ivy, though not tried it myself.
Erik
For us, ant has worked well and pretty much stayed out of the way
(like a build tool should).
Additionally, because of the widespread use, almost every tool has
an ant task (e.g. sablecc).
It looks like there are several scripting tasks now available for
the rare cases where normal
usage doesn't work.
On Dec 25, 2006, at 11:56 PM, Thomas Hicks wrote:
I just ran across an innocative, upcoming tool for Ant that might
make your life a great deal easier. It's called Virtual Ant:
http://www.placidsystems.com/virtualant/Default.aspx
regards,
-tom
At 09:54 PM 12/23/2006, you wrote:
Without starting a flame-war... ;)
I'm about to embark on updating a very brittle build process. It's
currently based on a combination of relying on the IDE + a bit of
ant
In all honesty, I know make better than I know any other build
tool, but
I'd rather not do this build in make. So, I'm looking for some input
into what build tool(s) you use, and why? Thanks!
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
