+1 From Me too...
--- Rick Hightower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for SWT
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie@;amo.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] E
+2 for SWT
At 03:59 PM 11/1/2002 -0700, you wrote:
+1 for SWT
-Original Message-
From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie@;amo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Warner Onstine wrote
+1 on SWT preso, especially if there was some info on using it
standalone and/or deployed using java web start, and/or on a Jeode JVM.
> Due to the lack of volunteers to present for the next meeting
Well, thinking in a vaguely similar vein, the Thinlet.com stuff builds
widgets entirely with AWT (
Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
When is the next meeting?
The next meeting is Tuesday, November 12th
Simon.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something on SWT would be great!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for SWT
-Original Message-
From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:simon.ritchie@;amo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Warner Onstine wrote:
>
> Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter t
When is the next meeting?
I would *love* to hear more about SWT and any eclipse plug-in
development.
Randy
On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 16:00, Simon Ritchie wrote:
> Warner Onstine wrote:
>
> >
> > Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my
> > impression initially, especial
Warner Onstine wrote:
Aren't all SWT widgets native (no matter the platform)? This was my
impression initially, especially in respect to why it took so long to
port it to OS X.
-warner
Yes, they are. SWT consists of some standard java code and also some JNI
native code. The native code is w
I double dog dare you.
-Original Message-
From: Lesiecki Nicholas [mailto:ndlesiecki@;yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse is better on Windows
Hah! you should post that to slashdot. It will start WWIII.
Cheers
On Friday, November 1, 2002, at 02:14 PM, Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows
2000.
Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than "natively" in Linux.
Strange...
I think the native SWT widgets make the difference.
Are the SWT w
Hah! you should post that to slashdot. It will start WWIII.
Cheers,
Nick
--- "Randolph S. Kahle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows
> 2000.
>
> Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than "natively" in Linux.
>
> Strange...
I run Linux on my workstation. On top of Linux I run vmware and Windows
2000.
Eclipse runs faster on Windows2000 in vmware than "natively" in Linux.
Strange...
I think the native SWT widgets make the difference.
Are the SWT widgets native on OS/X ?
-- Randy
--
12 matches
Mail list logo