Re: [jug-discussion] Prevayler

2004-02-20 Thread Michael Oliver
Yea we did and 'neat' is the word. Didn't Nick write something about it? Ollie On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 23:54, Tim Colson wrote: Say - has anybody tried this out? I read about it 'bout a year ago... neat sounding. http://www.prevayler.org/wiki.jsp Cheers, Timo

Re: [jug-discussion] Prevayler

2004-02-20 Thread Todd Ellermann
Rolled our own Tx Management (pretty simple transaction queue). As for the XML thing. the problem can be solved by handling the serialization manually and overriding the serial ID's etc... to pick up when an old form of the object is being read in. The xml thing would have given us a fill in

RE: [jug-discussion] Prevayler

2004-02-20 Thread Tim Colson
Say Todd - After you get that preso ready for the PHX JUG, what kind of bribe might it take to convince you to take the presentation on a roadshow down to the Old Pueblo for a TJUG meeting? Cheers, Tim - To unsubscribe,

RE: [jug-discussion] Prevayler

2004-02-20 Thread Todd Ellermann
Group of people to join me for dinner over at el corral or pinnacle peak. (Don't have to pay for my meal, just give me an excuse to go and speak propeller ;) FYI I am a native Tucsonian (like to keep my eye out on what is going on in the old pueblo.) -Todd __

Re: [jug-discussion] Prevayler

2004-02-20 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
You might want to look into my JiBX (http://www.jibx.org) project for the XML part, too. JiBX is a higher-level solution than Betwixt and Digester, which I think you'd find easier to set up while also delivering better performance. It's not as automatic as the bean serialization in JDK 1.4,