RE: [jug-discussion] Ajax, Laszlo, Flex

2005-05-19 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
Another couple good Ajax links... Pretty diagrams here: http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php Dude here responds to folks who think Ajax sucks... http://www.ajaxian.com/archives/2005/03/ease_of_deploym.html (BTW - don't get me wrong, I do think ajax and gmail are go

RE: [jug-discussion] Ajax, Laszlo, Flex

2005-05-19 Thread Tim Colson \(tcolson\)
> You could do the same admittedly with > Lazslo or Flex, but you're going to be outputting XML from > them anyways (in most cases). The backend can be any framework, but the paradigm is so different as to make the backend controllers not always 100% applicable. XML is probably the least eff

Re: [jug-discussion] Ajax, Laszlo, Flex

2005-05-19 Thread Warner Onstine
On May 19, 2005, at 6:04 AM, Steven Elliott wrote: On 5/18/05 07:24, "Warner Onstine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And I agree on the Ajax stuff, but since that can be done with any framework I'm not sure how easy/difficult it would be as a comparison. My understanding Laszlo and Flex are View Framew