My votes ;-)
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 02:03 PM, Warner Onstine wrote:
Ok,
Since the general consensus is that EJB requires it's own presentation
- (BTW who did the last one and can we put a link on the site
directing people to it?) I'm going to propose the following:
Let's keep the
At 02:03 PM 11/14/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Let's keep the current presentation to 4 tools (max), please vote for your
favorite.
Castor (castor.exolab.org)
+1
Hibernate (http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/)
+1
Torque (jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque)
+1
OJB (jakarta.apache.org/ojb)
+1
s/+1/+2/g
Michael Oliver
AppsAsPeers LLC
7391 S. Bullrider Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85747
Phone:(520)574-1150
Fax:(520)844-1036
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hicks [mailto:hickst;tohono.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] dec
, 2002 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] dec. presentation/jan. presentation
At 02:03 PM 11/14/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Let's keep the current presentation to 4 tools (max), please vote for
your
favorite.
Castor (castor.exolab.org)
+1
Hibernate (http
At 02:44 PM 11/14/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Sick!
Shouldn't that be s/\+1/\+2/g anyway?
Not in VI, but maybe he was doing SED?
-tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Castor (castor.exolab.org)
+0
Hibernate (http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/)
+1
Torque (jakarta.apache.org/turbine/torque)
+1
OJB (jakarta.apache.org/ojb)
-1
TJDO (http://tjdo.sourceforge.net/)
-1
My preference would be to drop TJDO and then present that
later on it's own.
+1
OJB seems
