On 12 January 2015 at 03:17, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
This is because the EC2 provider tags the machines with the environment
name, and not environment UUID. I think we should change this ASAP.
+1. The environment name should be purely client-local IMHO.
The main thing that
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
This is because the EC2 provider tags the machines with the environment
name, and not environment UUID. I think we should change this ASAP.
Tim, I'm glad you brought this up. We have followed the lead of the
EC2
On 12/01/15 22:23, roger peppe wrote:
On 12 January 2015 at 03:17, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
This is because the EC2 provider tags the machines with the environment
name, and not environment UUID. I think we should change this ASAP.
+1. The environment name should be purely
On 13/01/15 04:55, Eric Snow wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
This is because the EC2 provider tags the machines with the environment
name, and not environment UUID. I think we should change this ASAP.
Tim, I'm glad you brought this up. We
Hi!
First of all, thanks for such a great tool!
I've been implementing a simple charm to test apache2 vhost-config
relation: https://code.launchpad.net/~nicopace/+junk/simplewebservercharm
I can add both the apache2 and simplewebserver charm, but when i add the
relation, it says:
$ juju
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Nicolás Pace nicop...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
First of all, thanks for such a great tool!
I've been implementing a simple charm to test apache2 vhost-config relation:
https://code.launchpad.net/~nicopace/+junk/simplewebservercharm
I can add both the apache2 and
Hey Nico,
Michael is right over here. Both the apache2 charm and your test charm
*require* the vhost-config relation. A relation can only be established
if one charm requires and the other provides. You should be able to
change this on the metadata.yaml.
If you have any questions on how to
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 12 January 2015 at 15:43, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net
wrote:
A few quick notes:
- Having an
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 12 January 2015 at 15:43, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net
wrote:
A few quick notes:
- Having an understandable name in a resource useful
It's also good to be clear about what a name actually
