[Review Queue] bird, neutron-calico, openbook, plumgrid-gateway

Greetings, This past Friday, Andrew, Konstantinos, and I spent some time on the review queue. We'd like to thank the fine folks at MetaSwitch for their work on the bird and neutron-calico charms, which add Project Calico and its virtual networking support to OpenStack. - bird -

Re: [Review Queue] bird, neutron-calico, openbook, plumgrid-gateway

Just as a follow up, I went ahead and merged the OpenBook MP, as it LGTM aside from a few nits that really aren't blockers. Thanks for the attention to detail. All the best, Charles Butler - Juju Charmer Come see the future of modeling your datacenter:

Re: Regarding Juju Support for IBM SoftLayer

Hi Shilpa, Great question! We're really excited about SoftLayer cloud too and look forward to using it. Unfortunately, we're still working with SoftLayer to complete this work so you can't use it directly in Juju yet. However, Juju does have a manual provider. So you could use Juju with SoftLayer

Juju stable 1.25.3 is now released

# juju-core 1.25.3 A new stable release of Juju, juju-core 1.25.3, is now available. This release replaces version 1.25.0. ## Getting Juju juju-core 1.25.3 is available for Xenial and backported to earlier series in the following PPA: https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/stable Windows,

Juju stable 1.25.3 is now released

# juju-core 1.25.3 A new stable release of Juju, juju-core 1.25.3, is now available. This release replaces version 1.25.0. ## Getting Juju juju-core 1.25.3 is available for Xenial and backported to earlier series in the following PPA: https://launchpad.net/~juju/+archive/stable Windows,

Regarding Juju Support for IBM SoftLayer

Hi Team, I have a requirement where I need to deploy a charm on IBM SoftLayer Cloud. Can we give IBM SoftLayer as a cloud provider in Juju similar to AWS , local or OpenStack ? Thanks and Regards, Shilpa Kaul -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: Tags and object IDs

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Nate Finch wrote: > I was really trying not to give too much information about this exact > case, so we could avoid talking about a specific implementation, and focus > on the more general question of how we identify objects. Yes, we

Re: Tags and object IDs

I was really trying not to give too much information about this exact case, so we could avoid talking about a specific implementation, and focus on the more general question of how we identify objects. Yes, we get the bytes using an HTTP request, but that is irrelevant to my question :) On Mon,

Re: Tags and object IDs

I think to William's point, we should have already authenticated the unit as part of the API request, thus we should have a Unit object hanging around somewhere close to where that request is being made, and can just pass it into state. John =:-> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Nate Finch