Re: juju devel 2.0-beta1 is available for testing

2016-02-21 Thread Andrew Wilkins
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:06 PM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 21/02/16 03:57, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > > The lxd/ format has not been implemented yet. That will come later, > > along with support for remote lxd, which AFAIK does not exist in the > > provider. > > I'm not sure it

Re: juju devel 2.0-beta1 is available for testing

2016-02-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Rick Harding wrote: > Andreas, yes that's the known bug Ian mentioned due to an API change in > the latest lxd beta3. We'll get that updated ASAP. It works with the lxd > beta2. > > Thanks Is beta2 archived somewhere? All of lxd

Re: juju devel 2.0-beta1 is available for testing

2016-02-21 Thread Rick Harding
Andreas, yes that's the known bug Ian mentioned due to an API change in the latest lxd beta3. We'll get that updated ASAP. It works with the lxd beta2. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016, 9:29 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Ian Booth

Re: juju devel 2.0-beta1 is available for testing

2016-02-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Ian Booth wrote: > The lxd cloud works on Juju 2.0 beta1 out of the box. > > $ juju bootstrap mycontroller lxd > > There is no need to edit any clouds.yaml. It Just Works. > It does not work for me: andreas@duo:~$ juju bootstrap