Re: Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

2016-11-01 Thread Nate Finch
Thanks, Katherine, I had intended to mention in the email that this was a request for review by the tech board :) On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 5:14 PM Katherine Cox-Buday < katherine.cox-bu...@canonical.com> wrote: > Nate Finch writes: > > > In support of my PR that adds an

Re: Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

2016-11-01 Thread Katherine Cox-Buday
Nate Finch writes: > In support of my PR that adds an interactive mode for add-cloud, we needed to > add > jsonschema for the cloud configurations that can be inspected at runtime to > generate the > interactive queries. Thanks for the great write-up, Nate. I've

Dependencies added for new jsonschema support

2016-11-01 Thread Nate Finch
In support of my PR that adds an interactive mode for add-cloud, we needed to add jsonschema for the cloud configurations that can be inspected at runtime to generate the interactive queries. Unfortunately, the jsonschema package we're currently using

Re: Juju 2.0.1 is here!​

2016-11-01 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
This has been filed under https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1638304. Please continue discussion there. Thanks for the feedback Malte! Nicholas On 11/01/2016 08:19 AM, Malte Menkhoff wrote: Dear Juju-dev list, I am currently testing the different between Juju 2.0.0 and Juju 2.0.1

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an > extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all > eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused,

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an > extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all > eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused,

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Marco Ceppi
This is really one of the goals. python-jujuclient, amulet, and even to an extent deployer all poorly implement an abstraction to Juju. These will all eventually fall away in favor of a consolidated, focused, well built Object Oriented Python library. Marco On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 4:25 PM Ryan

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
This is good stuff. I think keeping it focused on Juju 2.0 and later, completely free of legacy shims, is a good thing. I'd love to be using this natively instead of the collective stack of [Amulet + Juju-deployer + python-jujuclient], and plan to take it for a spin. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Nov

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Ryan Beisner
This is good stuff. I think keeping it focused on Juju 2.0 and later, completely free of legacy shims, is a good thing. I'd love to be using this natively instead of the collective stack of [Amulet + Juju-deployer + python-jujuclient], and plan to take it for a spin. Cheers, Ryan On Tue, Nov

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > solicit, not illicit... unless the client is illegal?! ;) > Oops, should've been "elicit". > > -- > > Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder > Tel: +44(0)5603641316 > > (Thanks to the Saiku

Re: [ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Tom Barber
solicit, not illicit... unless the client is illegal?! ;) -- Director Meteorite.bi - Saiku Analytics Founder Tel: +44(0)5603641316 (Thanks to the Saiku community we reached our Kickstart goal,

[ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
Hi everyone, We've been working on a new python client for Juju. It's still in development, but we wanted to share the first bits to illicit feedback: https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju Features of this library include: * fully asynchronous - uses asyncio and async/await features of python

[ANN] Updated Python Juju Client

2016-11-01 Thread Tim Van Steenburgh
Hi everyone, We've been working on a new python client for Juju. It's still in development, but we wanted to share the first bits to illicit feedback: https://github.com/juju/python-libjuju Features of this library include: * fully asynchronous - uses asyncio and async/await features of python

Re: Juju 2.0.1 is here!​

2016-11-01 Thread Malte Menkhoff
Dear Juju-dev list, I am currently testing the different between Juju 2.0.0 and Juju 2.0.1 examplen an OpenStack provider which is based on Huawei FusionSphere. Juju 2.0.0 was able to get to the status of “Waiting for address” because we are using nova API calls instead of neutron API calls -