Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-23 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 23 February 2017 at 23:20, Simon Davy wrote: > One thing that seems to have landed in 2.1, which is worth noting IMO, is > the local juju lxd image aliases. > > tl;dr: juju 2.1 now looks for the lxd image alias juju/$series/$arch in the > local lxd server, and uses that if it finds it. > > Thi

Re: Juju 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here!

2017-02-23 Thread Simon Davy
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical < cur...@canonical.com> wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.1.0, and Conjure-up, are here! > > > ## What's new in 2.1.0 > > - Model migration > - Interactive `add-cloud` > - Networking changes > - Conjure-up > - LXD credential changes > - Chang

Re: Juju GUI handling of empty config breaks promulgated charms

2017-02-23 Thread Pete Vander Giessen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:31 AM John Meinel wrote: > AFAICT we fixed this in Juju 1.15, but there are 2 places you can pass > config. The old field uses the compatibility of "" means nil, the new field > handles nil vs "" correctly. The Juju CLI should work correctly, it sounds > like the GUI was

Re: PostgreSQL Use Case/Issues

2017-02-23 Thread James Beedy
Awesome. Thanks for this! > On Feb 23, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Stuart Bishop > wrote: > >> On 23 February 2017 at 15:46, Stuart Bishop >> wrote: >> On 23 February 2017 at 01:46, James Beedy wrote: >> I think I can fix this, but I'll need to make a corresponding adjustment in the Postgre

Re: PostgreSQL Use Case/Issues

2017-02-23 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 23 February 2017 at 15:46, Stuart Bishop wrote: > On 23 February 2017 at 01:46, James Beedy wrote: > >>> I think I can fix this, but I'll need to make a corresponding >>> adjustment in the PostgreSQL charm and the fix will only take effect >>> with updated services. >>> >> +1 for a fix. Thanks

Re: PostgreSQL Use Case/Issues

2017-02-23 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 23 February 2017 at 14:22, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 22/02/17 19:46, James Beedy wrote: > > A client can 'accept the defaults' by not setting any properties on >> >> the db relation when it joins (dating back to the original protocol >> with pyjuju). When the PostgreSQL charm runs its relat

Re: PostgreSQL Use Case/Issues

2017-02-23 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 23 February 2017 at 01:46, James Beedy wrote: >> I think I can fix this, but I'll need to make a corresponding >> adjustment in the PostgreSQL charm and the fix will only take effect >> with updated services. >> > +1 for a fix. Thanks. >> Its related to the above issue. Your charm connects an