conjure-up dev summary: aws native integration, vsphere <3, and ADDONS

New dev summary is out! http://blog.astokes.org/conjure-up-dev-summary-aws-cloud-native-integration-and-vsphere-3/ -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: Question about deploying Openstack with juju

Actually I know about it, but it is not working with virtual machines, am > I right ? > > On 08/10/2017 09:23 PM, Adam Stokes wrote: > > Wahi, > > https://conjure-up.io will allow you to do a full OpenStack deployment on > a single machine. Please have a look and see if that gets you

Re: Question about deploying Openstack with juju

Wahi, https://conjure-up.io will allow you to do a full OpenStack deployment on a single machine. Please have a look and see if that gets you what you want. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:28 PM wahi wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying to find some tutorial or resources about installing

Promulgate request: dokuwiki

Hi, Could I get cs:~adam-stokes/dokuwiki-32 promulgated? Thanks! Adam -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: conjure-up status: conjure-up is currently broken

Follow up, if you haven't done a fresh install of Ubuntu (meaning you've had a previous version of the snap core) you may be able to get around this by running `sudo snap revert core` until a proper solution can be found. On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:27 PM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.

conjure-up status: conjure-up is currently broken

The details can be found here: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snapd-2-26-9-and-conjure-up-no-longer-work/1348 I've pinged the snappy team and waiting to hear back on what the next course of action is. I'll send out another email once this issue is resolved. Thank you for your patience Adam --

Re: A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta1 and conjure-up are here!

conjure-up was merged into hombrew last night, please give the macOS version a try and let us know if there are any issues: brew install conjure-up Thanks! On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:21 PM Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > A new release of Juju, 2.2-beta1, and conjure-up,

Re: Juju 2.2-alpha and conjure-up, are here!

Thanks for the heads up, this is now fixed $ sudo snap refresh conjure-up --beta On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:49 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 16/03/17 14:19, Curtis Hovey-Canonical wrote: > > ## How do I get it? > > > > If you are running Ubuntu, you can get Juju from the

Re: [lxc-users] Kubernetes Storage Provisioning using LXD

Cross posting to juju lists. It is my understanding that if you add ceph units to your juju environment or setup an NFS export that kubernetes can make use of both of those. Someone from the containers team would know more. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM Eric wrote: >

Re: I still can't upload resources to the Charm store.

he/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Server at > api.jujucharms.com Port 443\n\n": invalid > character '<' looking for beginning of value > > > > 2017-02-05 15:51 GMT+01:00 Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com>: > > https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client/issues/96 > > N

Re: I still can't upload resources to the Charm store.

https://github.com/juju/charmstore-client/issues/96 No one from that team has provided any additional input, even though I've been asking and this is obviously a huge problem for users in general. On Sun, Feb 5, 2017, 8:13 AM Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Hi all > > >

Re: Removing the single point of failure

Circling back around to this. Do we have an ETA or any updates on the progress of interfaces.juju.solutions being folded into jujucharms.com? On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, 11:20 AM Marco Ceppi wrote: > Hey everyone, > > We're aware of the outage and working to bring the

[ANN] conjure-up classic snap available

Conjure-up is a power tool for getting started with big software. Conjure-up lets you summon up a big-software stack as a “spell” - a model of the stack, combined with extra know-how to get you from an installed stack to a fully usable one. Start using your big software instead of learning how to

Re: using a bundle with manually added machines (redux)

We have a feature coming in conjure-up that supports pinning and deploying to specific machines if on MAAS. You can test this out by adding the `ppa:conjure-up/daily-git` ppa and pressing the 'Architecture' button on the charm deploy screen. This will allow you to do 2 things: 1. Pin

Re: errors in my juju deploy of canonical distribution of kubernetes

Hey Brian You'll want to use conjure-up for the localhost (LXD) as we provide some alterations to the lxc profile that houses those charms. On Sun, Jan 1, 2017, 2:26 PM brian mullan wrote: > Environment: > > ubuntu 16.04 server VM (in kvm) > > 50GB disk > 8 GB ram > 4

Re: Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes 1.5.1 is here

At least on the mobile site the install instructions are not properly formatted (under getting started) On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 6:14 PM Jorge O. Castro wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm happy to announce that 1.5.1 is here, all charms have been pushed and > it's ready to go.

Re: conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:49 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: Developers will love this, the ability to spin up k8s in multi-node mode on a laptop is fantastic! I wonder if it's worth providing a page of instructions for the sysctl changes built-in to conjure-up? Currently within

conjure-up Canonical Kubernetes in LXD

Just pulled in changes to support deploying The Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes on the localhost cloud type. I've blogged about it here: http://blog.astokes.org/conjure-up-canonical-kubernetes-under-lxd-today/ Please give it a shot deploy some workloads on it and let us know how it goes.

Re: Crashdump plugin

Nice, one thing you could do is tie this in with sosreport and just run that against the machines. It already has support for juju, lxd, openstack, etc. https://github.com/sosreport/sos And a list of all the plugins we support are here: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/tree/master/sos/plugins

Re: lxd hook failed change-config

Heather, A bug has been filed about this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-lxd/+bug/1635659 I've asked that it get top priority in order to have this fixed pushed into the charmstore asap. I'll let you know once the updated charm is available for deployment again. Sorry for the

Re: lxd hook failed change-config

This looks like it's due to the way we deploy OpenStack with NovaLXD in all containers, this effectively breaks anyone wanting to do an all-in-one install on their system. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > So it looks like a rece

Re: lxd hook failed change-config

ing that way for weeks. I did have the openstack-novalxd > bundle successfully deployed on it previously using juju 2.0_rc1. > > -Heather > > On Oct 20, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > Odd it looks like the container has a rea

Re: lxd hook failed change-config

Odd it looks like the container has a read only file system? I ran through a full openstack-novalxd deployment today and one of the upstream maintainers ran through the same deployment and didn't run into any issues. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016, 10:02 PM Heather Lanigan wrote: > >

Re: [ANN] Mattermost and layer:lets-encrypt

This is very awesome! On Sat, Oct 15, 2016, 12:07 PM Casey Marshall wrote: > With a much appreciated recent contribution from James Beedy (bdx) our > Mattermost charm cs:~cmars/mattermost[1] is working again! > > This encouraged me to add some followup improvements

Re: Canonical Distribution of Kubernetes - Update Release Notes (16.10 cycle)

Nice! One question though maybe I'm missing something but I didn't see where the conjure-up instructions were shown on the jujucharms.com page? https://jujucharms.com/canonical-kubernetes/ It is in the README though

Re: juju @ conjure-up on Power8 , Free Trial on SoftLayer

Conjure-up is Juju 2.0, MAAS 2.0, and Xenial only. You will need to use the previous openstack-installer if on trusty. Also if KVM is not supported on power you'll need to use a different virt-type for nova-compute. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, 6:23 AM John Meinel wrote: > I

Re: Layer-Supervisor

looks good, one small nit pick, maybe change supervisorlib.py to just supervisor.py. that seems to be the current naming scheme of things On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:42 PM, James Beedy wrote: > A big thanks to those of you who gave feedback! I have made some revisions >

Re: Layer-Supervisor

One thing (which I haven't done yet in some of my layers) is to place your supervisorlib in `lib/charms/layer`. A nice first start though! On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote: > On 21 July 2016 at 10:40, James Beedy wrote: > >

Re: grabbing resources when deploying via api Application.Deploy

and include those in the deploy request. > > Hope this helps anyone else trying to use the resources feature > programatically. > > Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> writes: > > > I've noticed a difference between calling: > > > > juju deploy cs:~c

Conjure-up, an Introduction

schedule until a GA release so now is the perfect time to get involved and file bugs to help make this product the go-to tool for deploying any and all big software. :) Thanks, Ubuntu Solutions Engineering Team Adam Stokes, Mike McCracken, Daniel Westervelt -- Juju mailing list Juju

where is upstream code for charms displayed?

For whatever reason I'm having a difficult time figuring out where the upstream source code is for a charm that I wish to contribute to. For example, going here: https://jujucharms.com/elasticsearch/trusty/15 What should I be looking for or clicking on that'll take me to a place where I can

Re: Bash completion

It looks like it still doesn't work, running juju version 2.0-beta8.4022-xenial-amd64 I'm unable to juju to get a list of subcommands On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Nicholas Skaggs < nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> wrote: > Beta8 contains what I hope are some fixes for bash completion. It

Re: rabbitmq-server hook "config-changed" failed (dns resolver)

I believe he's using the LXD provider, here is the status output: https://paste.ubuntu.com/16640152/ He's running into this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1574844 According to the bug a fix is in process and should hopefully make it into beta8 On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:31

Re: Introducing a Daily PPA for Juju

Enablement juju experimental packages juju-golang juju packages juju proposed packages juju stable packages Juju Staging On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > Nice but this version is a bit crazy: > > 2.0-beta7~20160512~3966~0bd48e6f-2016051

Re: Introducing a Daily PPA for Juju

Nice but this version is a bit crazy: 2.0-beta7~20160512~3966~0bd48e6f-20160512+3966+0bd48e6f~16.04 Maybe just drop -20160512+3966+0bd48e6f as it seems to be repetative On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > Absolutely <3 this. > > On Thu, May 12,

Re: Status of cs:xenial/ceph-0 and cs:xenial/ceph-osd-0

ver was using >> juju 1.25. >> >> On May 7, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> >> wrote: >> >> We've been using it with conjure-up and it works well for us. >> >> On Sat, May 7, 2016, 1:56 PM James Beedy <jam

Re: Status of cs:xenial/ceph-0 and cs:xenial/ceph-osd-0

We've been using it with conjure-up and it works well for us. On Sat, May 7, 2016, 1:56 PM James Beedy wrote: > I have been testing out cs:xenial/ceph-0, and cs:xenial/ceph-osd-0, with > no luck of getting either to deploy without error. Does anyone know the > status of

Re: 16.04 OpenStack charm release

Kirkland <kirkl...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > > On 23/04/16 09:35, Adam Stokes wrote: > >> I don't think it's a hard rule it is just the hardware I have at the > >> time. I'm fix

Re: 16.04 OpenStack charm release

excessive > and will rule out many developer laptops. > > > > Best Regards > > > > Mark Baker > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > >> On 23/04/16 09:10, Adam Stokes wrote: >> >> Also we hav

Re: 16.04 OpenStack charm release

Also we have conjure-up.io up and running as well. On Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 10:09 AM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > We are currently working a few kinks out to have a fully turnkey solution > for Nova LXD. The option already exist but there are a few rough spo

Re: 16.04 OpenStack charm release

We are currently working a few kinks out to have a fully turnkey solution for Nova LXD. The option already exist but there are a few rough spots that we are fixing today. On Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 10:07 AM Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > Perhaps the best way to test these is with the

Re: juju 2.0 beta3 push this week

Hi! Could I get this bug added to the list too? https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1554721 On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Rick Harding wrote: > > > tl;dr > Juju 2.0 beta3 will not be out this week. > > The team is fighting a backlog of getting work landed.

Re: Issue with (some) layered charms in network-restricted envs

Not sure if this would help, but, I recently came across this https://github.com/pantsbuild/pex. Would something like this help for keeping charms self contained? On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 4:45 PM Cory Johns wrote: > I'd like to raise awareness of the following issue open

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

and display the uuids and other > data. > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 8:37 AM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> One of the problems using `juju list-controllers --format yaml` versus >> reading the controllers.yaml file directly is the information i

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

t;> exists. But you do need to look at controllers.yaml to see what > >> controllers you > >> have bootstrapped or have access to in order to make the remote list > >> models api > >> call. > >> > >> On 01/03/16 13:14, Adam Stokes wrot

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

ve logged into for the API. > > What are you wanting? > > You need a different API connection for each controller. > > Tim > > On 01/03/16 15:05, Adam Stokes wrote: > > Right, but how do you specify which controller you want to list the > > models for? The o

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

29, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Ian Booth <ian.bo...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 01/03/16 11:25, Adam Stokes wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.pen...@canonical.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On 01/03/16 03:48, Adam Stokes wrote: > &

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.pen...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 01/03/16 03:48, Adam Stokes wrote: > > Is there a way to list all models for a specific controller? > > Yes. Mind pointing me to the api docs that has that capability? -- Juju mailing list

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

model related api code under modelmanager? On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > Ok perfect, i'll try these tags out with the api. Thanks again > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Ian Booth <ian.bo...@canonical.com> > wrote:

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

of it as users for a > controller > you bootstrap yourself are local to that controller. > > On 27/02/16 11:29, Adam Stokes wrote: > > Thanks that makes sense now. I don't have aws or anything but what would > > the admin user tag for those clouds look like? > > > &

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

Thanks that makes sense now. I don't have aws or anything but what would the admin user tag for those clouds look like? On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Andrew Wilkins < andrew.wilk...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.

Re: Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

Also, will the API support non admin users to login and query the various modelmanager methods they have access to? If so, will this be available by GA release? On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > Currently, the only way to login to the Juj

Logging into the API on Juju 2.0

Currently, the only way to login to the Juju 2.0 api is to use the Tag of 'user-admin'. However, all the files created by juju during bootstrap (accounts.yaml, models.yaml, controllers.yaml) only mention the admin user as 'admin@local' for the controller. When will the API login support logging

Re: LXD support (maybe)

When will this PR make it into the lxd-container-type feature branch so we can start testing this? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Ian Booth wrote: > FWIW, go 1.6 works just fine with Juju on my system > > On 26/02/16 08:34, Menno Smits wrote: > > On 26 February 2016

Re: Breaking news - New Juju 2.0 home^H^H^H^H data location

Does this mean the environments.yaml file is going away at some point? On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > Does this mean the environments.yaml file is going away at some point? > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Ian Booth <ian.b

Re: Problem deploying a bundle

You'll need to update your revisions in the bundle file. We ran into this problem as well yesterday and it has to deal with charmhelpers regex when matching package_names -> openstack_versions. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I've created my

Re: Apt layer released

Why would someone want to use this instead of what's provided in charmhelpers? On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote: > The Apt layer is more code broken out from my PostgreSQL charm work > that will be used by future Cassandra charm work. > > It

Re: Apt layer released

Cool thanks for the additional info, I'm going to integrate this into my layers now On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Stuart Bishop <stuart.bis...@canonical.com > wrote: > On 28 January 2016 at 23:01, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> > wrote: > > Why would someone

Re: additional catering towards the application developer

Also there seems to be a couple of bugs relevant to this discussion: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1445066 https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1445078 On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > I agree, having the ability to ru

additional catering towards the application developer

I wanted to write this to get a discussion going around how we can better support application developers. This is something I've been thinking about for awhile and was further convinced to write this email after seeing posts like:

Re: Charm layers and python2 dependencies

You can use `pip2` and it'll pull down the python 2.7 flask On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Merlijn Sebrechts < merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > > Since shortly, Charm build creates Python3 Charms instead of Python2. I > have a Charm that installs a Python2 application. It

Re: [ANN] charm-tools 1.9.3

What if we only needed pure python modules? It seems like the toolchain will always be installed because of some of the dependencies of charmhelpers? Will these additional deps become optional once charmhelpers is refactored? On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, 11:18 PM Marco Ceppi

Re: Here's our pile of new Juju questions for the week!

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Jorge O. Castro wrote: > Happy Monday folks, here's the latest questions I've screened from our > users that could use some love. Remember, you can subscribe to a tag > to get an automated list of curated questions by hovering over the > "juju"

Re: Juju service commands or communitation protocol

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 05/11/15 00:19, André Moreira wrote: > > Thank you, Adam. This is exactly what I was looking for. > > André > > If you end up making bindings for another language like Ruby or Node > then we'll be glad to publicise

Re: Juju service commands or communitation protocol

If you're going to use Go or creating bindings of your own the api documentation is https://godoc.org/github.com/juju/juju/api. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:30 AM, André Moreira wrote: > Thank you, Mark, for the reply. > Nice to know there is this library and there will be an

Re: Juju service commands or communitation protocol

; > 2015-11-04 11:34 GMT-02:00 Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com>: > >> If you're going to use Go or creating bindings of your own the api >> documentation is https://godoc.org/github.com/juju/juju/api. >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:30 AM, André

charmers: request to add node.js layer

Hi, I think my layer is ready for use https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-node I realize there is pending changes to the actual composer names, aside from that could I get a review on this and possibly added to http://interfaces.juju.solutions? -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: charmers: request to add node.js layer

tem. > > Thanks, > Ben > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 8:02 AM Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think my layer is ready for use >> https://github.com/battlemidget/juju-layer-node I realize there is >

nodejs reactive layer

I'm looking to get my nodejs layer[1] included at http://interfaces.juju.solutions and wanted to make sure that this charm can be properly tested. I noticed that a Makefile is generated during `charm-compose` and was curious how I can utilize that with amulet or whatever the preferred way to test

Re: nodejs reactive layer

to just one thing, ie node layer only installs node.js and exposes its installed state. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Adam Stokes <adam.sto...@canonical.com> wrote: > I'm looking to get my nodejs layer[1] included at > http://interfaces.juju.solutions and wanted to make sure tha

Re: local provider

. (feel free to s/demo/testing/ or any other not ready for production word) What do you think? -Nate -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju-dev mailing list

Re: I gave a quick writeup over Juju on Digital Ocean

@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

Re: I gave a quick writeup over Juju on Digital Ocean

Something else that would be cool is to submit your blog posts as a tutorial on DO On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@ubuntu.com wrote: There is also this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1372543 On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Charles Butler charles.but

Re: juju as a web service

-- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: python-django charm with subordinate app - help needed

Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: juju-nat

...@gmail.com wrote: It is the latest 1.18.3.1 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@ubuntu.com wrote: Need to make sure you're using juju 1.18.3 or higher On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:16 PM, brian mullan bmullan.m...@gmail.com wrote: Kapil Ubuntu 14.04 server x64 bit

Filing SRU's

). Thanks! -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: Questions about the integration of the Outscale cloud provider into juju-core

at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: New Juju Plugin: git-deploy

-- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: New Juju Plugin: git-deploy

://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova Quantum

@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju -- [ Adam Stokes ] -- Juju mailing list Juju@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju

Re: juju api and authenticated request

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote: hybi-13 is the rfc version. the library jujuclient is using also has a python3 variant. I guess my question is what version of the websocket spec is supported in the juju api server? Any attempt to make a

Re: juju api and authenticated request

code now as well: ProtocolVersionHybi = ProtocolVersionHybi13 Do the latest libraries like go.net/websocket get pulled in during each release? On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav

Re: juju api and authenticated request

Got it working for anyone curious: http://paste.ubuntu.com/6910254/ On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Adam Stokes adam.sto...@ubuntu.com wrote: I tried a python3 variant that uses ws4py which is RFC 6455 compliant and can not seem to get the login to work: # OUtput connection opened