+1 from me.
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On Sep 24, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Chris Glass chris.gl...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
This is awesome!! I just tried it and I am impressed. Thank you all :)
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On May 15, 2014, at 11:29 AM,
This is awesome Marco!
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On May 7, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Gustavo Niemeyer gust...@niemeyer.net wrote:
This
I second Charles’ comments. +1
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Charles Butler charles.but...@canonical.com
Markdown +1 IMO
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Marco Ceppi marco.ce...@canonical.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm spreading this email out across the juju-core, juju, and juju-gui list
to start a discussion about the next format for the docs. Currently, I've
worked on a proof of concept to
I'm convinced. +1 from me.
IMO, this should be the new format.
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On Mar 14, 2014 10:29 PM, Charles Butler
Big +1 to this proposal. Not all of mine have it but I will make sure that
they doo soon :-)
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On Dec 12,
+1 on making it a hook. It sounds like a good the juju way of doing it :)
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:59 AM, David Cheney david.che...@canonical.comwrote:
Lets make it a hook, that sounds like the only way it can be
implemented without showing a bias towards any one solution.
On Sat, Nov 9,
I think they should be removed from the charm store.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Marco Ceppi marco.ce...@canonical.comwrote:
We still have and display oneiric charms in the charm store. I'm going to
keep this brief, but:
Can you still deploy to oneiric?
Do we want this to be displayed
This sounds like a good idea.
Thanks,
Juan L. Negron juan.neg...@canonical.com
Mobile: +1 408 634 0292
Cloud Architect
Canonical Technical Services
Canonical USA
GPG : 0A62 BC70 5CBC B4DD F3E6 8A27 A6B1 F3F0 E6B5 F5A3
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:27 AM, David Cheney
10 matches
Mail list logo